In the etymology section common places for bibliographic references are:
- as a child of
<etym>
or
- w/in etymons, cognates (i.e.
<cit>
)
In the etymology section these can be <bibl>
or <ref type="bibl">
.
We have <ref type="bibl">
(with a pointer to the source in @target
) as the alternative to <bibl>
where there is a predeclared bibliography that can be referenced.
In the current draft of the ODD these are not allowed (though I'm sure we've discussed this).
As for the changes, I think that making <bibl>
a member of model.entryPart
is one of the things needed, I'm not sure about what to do with <ref>
's content model...
Bonus:
Even though it is beyond the etymology section, it would be good to allow <bibl>
to occur as a child of (which is strangely not allowed). I also noticed that isn't allowed as a child of <entry>
, (it is in the general TEI though). Since <ref type="bibl">
can occur wherever a <bibl>
might occur, it would be good to make sure they are both allowed in the same places.
I would support and take the lead on pushing to get all of these added to the general TEI