Batch script problems about igv HOT 10 CLOSED

My batch job that I started yesterday was only able to do 48 gotos/snapshots in the 5 hours I'd requested on the node before it got kicked off. When I run the same script in 2.0.3, it finishes in a matter of minutes. Does 2.3.3 use a lot more memory? Maybe I'm hitting swap space.

from igv.

We have become aware of issues with batch scripts in version 2.3.3. We are working on the problem, in the meantime I suggest you continue to use 2.0.3

from igv.

Well, I wish I could, but my current workflow requires that all the coverage plots have the same data range and I can't get that to work in 2.0.3. Setting the data range via the script (or via the GUI) does work in 2.3.3 and the setting keeps from position to position (which is great). It just takes much much longer. I timed the drawing of one of my 6 coverage tracks and it took roughly 25 seconds. Of course, it does that for each track and then wipes out and redraws all the tracks over again (at least 6 times over the one time I just sat and watched it go).

Good luck with the fix!

from igv.

I have discovered that the slowness relates to using IGV via x11. I'd found a similar post from someone transitioning from version 2.1.x to 2.2.1. In their case, all they had to do was turn off anti-aliasing and it returned to its previous peppiness. Such was not the case for me. It still went excruciatingly slow (about 15 minutes for each snapshot, whereas version 2.0.3 did it in a second or 2). Even clicking menus caused a 5-15 second wait. So I started using a "vis node" on our cluster that's souped up for visualization and is utilized via some sort of fancy VNC. I'm running my scripts on that now and it's taking a few second for each snapshot - still not as fast as 2.0.3, but workable.

from igv.

Thanks for the updates. Both the IGV programmers happen to be out of the office right now, but addressing problems with batch scripts is definitely a high priority for us.

from igv.

Hi.
I am having this problem with the latest build of IGV snapshot:
IGV Version Snapshot (1012 (2014-01-21_00-00-38))01/21/2014 12:19 AM

I run IGV on a cluster using an interactive node with X11 forwarding on my Mac. It is running slowly and for each snapshot I have to wait and watch the screen redraw about 3 times. I am trying to take hundreds of snapshots and this is running excruciatingly slowly. Has this issue not been addressed yet? I see that these posts are from over 9 months ago.

I can't run an older version of IGV, which works quickly, because I am running into this problem: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/igv-help/5NaVpKNVbB8/ZXTuh9Lp0ssJ

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.

from igv.

Hi, its difficult for us to fix problems we can't reproduce. If you could provide some profiling information or otherwise pinpoint what is causing the issue it would help. As an alternative, have you tried using a VNC or other configuration to avoid the X11 forwarding?

from igv.

Another suggestion, could you try disabling antialiasing? You can do this from the UI, select "View > Preferences" and click the Advanced tab. Uncheck the "Enable antialiasing" box.

from igv.

Thanks for your reply.
I did disable antialiasing prior to my post and there was a slight improvement in performance, from redrawing the image 6+ times to 3 times, but it is still very slow.

I'm not exactly sure what profiling information would be helpful to you. There are no error messages to provide, it is just running very slow. I can provide my script, which basically loads three exomes at a time, goes to a specific location, and takes two snapshots (one with expanded tracks and one collapsed), then the process is repeated for a new set of three exomes.

I am running IGV on a computer cluster (HMS Orchestra) in an interactive node with 10GB of maximum memory. I launch IGV with the following command:

/path-to/jre1.7.0_17/bin/java -Xmx2g -jar /path-to/snapshot-20140121/IGV_Snapshot/igv.jar &

I use X11 forwarding on my Mac with XQuartz 2.7.5 (latest version). My Mac has 20GB of memory.

I do not believe we have VNC, but I will look into it.

Any other suggestions? Thanks so much.

from igv.

Closing this issue. I do have not additional suggestions for running over X11, and unfortunately its not something we can support with the resources we have.

from igv.