Git Product home page Git Product logo

asio_benchmark's Introduction

asio_benchmark

asio性能测试程序集

支持windows和linux平台。

Usage: asio_test socketpair <pair_count> <active_count> <write_count>

Usage: asio_test client1

Usage: asio_test server1

Usage: asio_test client2

Usage: asio_test server2

Usage: asio_test client3

Usage: asio_test server3

Usage: asio_test posttask1

Usage: asio_test posttask2

Usage: asio_test posttask3

Usage: asio_test posttask4

Usage: asio_test posttask5

1,socketpair是测试socketpair的性能。

2,client1/server1 是固定长度的echo client/server。

3,client2/server2 是任意长度的echo client/server。

4,client3/server3 是带包头的echo client/server。

5,posttask1是多个线程排成一圈,依次给下一个线程post task,task为递增一个成员变量,直到递增到设定次数为止。

6,posttask2是偶数个线程两两分成多组,组内两个线程来回post task,task为递增一个成员变量(需要用atomic),直到递增到设定次数为止。

7,postask3是线程1向线程2发送指定数量的task。

8,postask4是线程1向线程2发送指定数量的task,但是并不真正发送这么多次,而是检查一个带锁的队列,如果队列不为空则直接插入不发送。

9,postask5是posttask4的改进版。队列直接保存task本身。这更接近真实情况。posttask4过于简化任务了。

[huyuguang@dtrans1 ~/code/asio]$ ./asio_test.exe posttask3 10000000 use time(us): 9077386

[huyuguang@dtrans1 ~/code/asio]$ ./asio_test.exe posttask4 10000000 use time(us): 638762

[huyuguang@dtrans1 ~/code/asio]$ ./asio_test.exe posttask5 10000000 use time(us): 4202412

posttask4是理想情况。posttask5比较接近真实情况。但实际上由于posttask5的实现是高度优化的,包括用了2个实现reserved的vector来回swap,因此我怀疑并不值得采用posttask5这样的上层优化。

asio_benchmark's People

Contributors

huyuguang avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

asio_benchmark's Issues

关于asio的效率问题,求指点

您好,我自己写了一个demo, 一个echo服务器,客户端服务器均采用的单线程,QPS大约只有2400~3000,用您的asio_benchmark测试数据要稍微好点,但是也好不了多少,也是在3000以下,难道单线程asio的效率就这么高吗? 还是我哪儿没弄对? 感觉不可能会这么低啊。

测试环境是 i7-5700HQ 2.7GHZ 8G内存 笔记本 64位win10 .

期待您的回复

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.