Git Product home page Git Product logo

otfs-chan-est-and-eq's People

Contributors

hassiweb avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar

otfs-chan-est-and-eq's Issues

NMSE

Hello sir, do you have the code for evaluating the normalized mean square error (NMSE) according to your paper?

Question about updating delay and Doppler parameters

  % The FDF is not a causal filter, especially if the delay is less than 1.
  
  % In this case, the FDF cannot keep the energy of an input signal such as a discontinuous signal (e.g., delta function).
  
  % To keep the same energy between discontinuous signals and continous signals, operations below convert parameters to express fractional delays.
  
  this.pathOrigRayleighGains = this.pathRayleighGains;
  
  this.pathOrigDopplers = this.pathDopplers;
  
  [this.pathRayleighGains, this.pathDopplers, this.pathDelays, this.pathOffsets] = fdfpathpars(this.pathRayleighGains, this.pathDopplers, this.delayProfile, this.pathOffsets, this.SamplingRate);
  
  this.pathDelaysInSample = this.pathDelays*this.SamplingRate;

Why update the path parameters through the fractional filter, I see that the number of paths has increased after the update, can the basis of the operation here provide some reference? ^_^

regarding error in running the code

Sir kindly help in this regard
getf1f2' is used in Parallel Concatenated Convolutional Coding: Turbo Codes.

Error in LteChannelCoder (line 88)
[f1, f2] = getf1f2(Kplus); % defined in TS36.212 section 5.1.3.2.3 Table 5.1.3-3

Error in OTFS (line 119)
hChannelCoder = LteChannelCoder(

What do these parameters mean when performing Wiener deconvolution?

if not(isempty(denominator(denominator<threshold)))
Pt = sqrt(MN)0.9472; % for 16QAM
Pr = mean(abs(Ydd_dft(:)));
Ph = (Pr - noiseVar
sqrt(M
N));
Ph_est = mean(abs(Hdd_dft(:)));
est_err = (Ph_estPt - Ph)/sqrt(MN)/2;
denominator = denominator + est_err;
end
What do Pt, Pr, Ph and Ph_est stand for?
Hope you can tell me, thank you

About the algorithm 1 in the paper.

You had written about the reason why using the stopping criteria.
But I am confused about the "if " in the repeat loop.
Why stop when finding the current path has a higher gain than the last?
image

An issue when running your code

Hi,

I am very happy to find your code. But when I want to reproduce your results by running your code, one issue happened. The hChannelCoder.decoder outputs the whole decoded code, so its dimension will not meet with txBits's dimension. Besides, the BLERs of all SNRs are 1.00 when I run this code. I think that's because of the decoder problem. Can you fix it? Thanks.

best,
Xiang

P.S. I use MATLAB 2019 to run your code on WINDOWS. I don't know if my problem comes from a different platform.

OTFS Pilot-Based channel estimation without fractional doppler

Hello!

Thank you for sharing these interesting results and making the codes available.

I would like to know if you have any implementation done for OTFS Pilot-Based channel estimation in a channel that does not consider fractional doppler.

I started working on DNN-based channel estimation for OTFS with pilot insertion and channel estimation being done in the frequency domain, taking advantage of its properties of OTFS compared to OFDM and without increasing the complexity of going to DD domain estimation. I think that comparing the estimators I am proposing to your proposal will be a great indicator of the next steps, but I'm facing problems in changing the functions that implement the fading to design a channel without this fractional effect. That is crucial to have identical scenarios for a fair comparison between our estimators.

Again, thank you so much for your valuable work and help.

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.