Tasks composition without gulp about undertaker HOT 5 CLOSED

Haha, I've just found https://github.com/gulpjs/bach in your pinned repos, @phated :D So is the tl;dr – use bach instead of undertaker? :D

from undertaker.

@Reinmar I think using bach might be better for your use case because it doesn't seem like you are benefiting at all from your use of undertaker (note: undertaker can take plain functions instead of registered task strings and would act similar to bach). If you just made the "tasks" named functions and passed them to bach.series, you'd end up in pretty much the same place without the undertaker overhead.

from undertaker.

Btw, thanks for opening this deep-dive. I love learning about other use cases for these libraries.

from undertaker.

@Reinmar is there anything further to discuss here? Otherwise I'd like to close this.

from undertaker.

Going to close this due to inactivity.

from undertaker.