googlefonts / lexend Goto Github PK
View Code? Open in Web Editor NEWA variable font family designed to aid in reading proficiency.
License: SIL Open Font License 1.1
A variable font family designed to aid in reading proficiency.
License: SIL Open Font License 1.1
A user reported that the ft
pair is too tightly spaced in the wght-max, and indeed ff
and tt
are looser.
Its more evenly spaced in Regular
@dberlow do you think the spacing should change? Perhaps a positive kerning pair?
Hi,
In West Africa here we are always looking for some more interesting fonts usable in the local languages. I maintain a small list of fonts that are suitable for the Mande language group.
https://coastsystems.net/blog/en/blog/2020-08-26-fontlist/
Your font is partly there but missing a couple of glyphs. What we need are:
Glyph IPA | Unicode |
---|---|
ɔ | "0254 |
Ɔ | "0186 |
ɛ | "025B |
Ɛ | "0190 |
ɲ | "0272 |
Ɲ | "019D |
ŋ | "014B |
Ŋ | "014A |
You already have 2 out of 4!!
If one day we could get lexend it would benefit some 30 million people that have only about 40 fonts at the present time.
Thanks!
A user said,
the latin doesn’t interpolate well. The accents and punctuation have an inconsistent thickness compare to the letters, spacing of light is super tight etc.
Hello!
This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in LexendZetta[wght].ttf
, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.
To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.
The report follows:
Glyph colonmonetary was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in '', [1, 0, 2] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph numbersign was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [0, 2, 1, 3] in 'wght=199.9939'
Glyph product was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in '', [2, 1, 0] in 'wght=199.9939'
Glyph uni20AD was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=199.9939'; reversed: True
Contour 2 start point differs: 0 in '', 3 in 'wght=199.9939'; reversed: True
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=199.9939', 1 in 'wght=100.0'; reversed: True
Contour 2 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=199.9939', 3 in 'wght=100.0'; reversed: True
Glyph uni20B1 was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=199.9939'
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=900.0'
This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable
tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please accept our apologies and ignore / close it.
To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.
Hello!
This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in LexendExa[wght].ttf
, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.
To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.
The report follows:
Glyph colonmonetary was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in '', [1, 0, 2] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph plus was not compatible:
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=199.9939', 1 in 'wght=100.0'; reversed: False
Glyph uni20AD was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=199.9939'; reversed: True
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] in 'wght=199.9939', [0, 2, 1, 3, 4] in 'wght=100.0'
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=199.9939', 1 in 'wght=100.0'; reversed: True
Glyph uni20B1 was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=199.9939'
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=900.0'
This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable
tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please accept our apologies and ignore / close it.
To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.
It seems more appropriate to have differentiating stroke for zero to avoid confusion with the letter O.
Other typefaces which are also focused on legibility such as Atkinson Hyperlegible and more recently, Inclusive Sans, has a slash and a dot, respectively, for their zeroes.
The "A" letter of Lexend font is displayed differently on the web on all iMacs used by me and my client for verification.
Everything is ok on iPad and iPhone and all other browser and OS combinations tested so far.
Probable cause: The curve directions of the two bestant parts are not the same.
Could you please fix and update the font?
Thanks for your time and help in advance!
BTW, the font stored locally on the server is included in CSS as follows:
@font-face { font-family: "Lexend"; font-style: normal; font-weight: 500; font-display: swap; src: url("../fonts/lexend/lexend-v14-latin-500.eot"); src: local("Lexend"), url("../fonts/lexend/lexend-v14-latin-500.eot?#iefix") format("embedded-opentype"), url("../fonts/lexend/lexend-v14-latin-500.woff") format("woff"), url("../fonts/lexend/lexend-v14-latin-500.ttf") format("truetype"), url("../fonts/lexend/lexend-v14-latin-500.svg#Lexend") format("svg"); }
Hello!
This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in LexendDeca[wght].ttf
, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.
To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.
The report follows:
Glyph colonmonetary was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in '', [1, 0, 2] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph plus was not compatible:
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=199.9939', 1 in 'wght=100.0'; reversed: False
Glyph uni20AD was not compatible:
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] in 'wght=199.9939', [0, 2, 1, 3, 4] in 'wght=100.0'
Glyph uni20B1 was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=199.9939'
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=900.0'
This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable
tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please accept our apologies and ignore / close it.
To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.
(This issus is a copy of ThomasJockin/readexpro#61)
I like this typeface. I think it could be better if there's an variant for 1
, 3
, 4
, 7
.
1
without bottom serif3
with arched top4
with semi-open contour7
with initial serifJust like DIN 1451:
Thanks!!
Hello!
This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in LexendPeta[wght].ttf
, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.
To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.
The report follows:
Glyph colonmonetary was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in '', [1, 0, 2] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph numbersign was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [0, 2, 1, 3] in 'wght=199.9939'
Glyph product was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in '', [2, 1, 0] in 'wght=199.9939'
Glyph uni20AD was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=199.9939'; reversed: True
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=199.9939', 1 in 'wght=100.0'; reversed: True
Glyph uni20B1 was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=199.9939'
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=900.0'
This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable
tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please accept our apologies and ignore / close it.
To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.
Hello!
This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in LexendMega[wght].ttf
, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.
To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.
The report follows:
Glyph colonmonetary was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in '', [1, 0, 2] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph numbersign was not compatible:
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in 'wght=199.9939', [0, 2, 1, 3] in 'wght=100.0'
Glyph product was not compatible:
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in 'wght=199.9939', [2, 1, 0] in 'wght=100.0'
Glyph uni20AD was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=199.9939'; reversed: True
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=199.9939', 1 in 'wght=100.0'; reversed: True
Glyph uni20B1 was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=199.9939'
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=900.0'
This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable
tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please accept our apologies and ignore / close it.
To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.
Hello!
This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in LexendTera[wght].ttf
, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.
To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.
The report follows:
Glyph colonmonetary was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in '', [1, 0, 2] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph numbersign was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [0, 2, 1, 3] in 'wght=199.9939'
Glyph product was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in '', [2, 1, 0] in 'wght=199.9939'
Glyph uni20AD was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=199.9939'; reversed: True
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=199.9939', 1 in 'wght=100.0'; reversed: True
Glyph uni20B1 was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=199.9939'
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=900.0'
This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable
tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please accept our apologies and ignore / close it.
To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.
Hello!
This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in Lexend[wght].ttf
, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.
To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.
The report follows:
Glyph colonmonetary was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in '', [1, 0, 2] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph plus was not compatible:
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=199.9939', 1 in 'wght=100.0'; reversed: False
Glyph uni20AD was not compatible:
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] in 'wght=199.9939', [0, 2, 1, 3, 4] in 'wght=100.0'
Glyph uni20B1 was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=199.9939'
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=900.0'
This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable
tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please accept our apologies and ignore / close it.
To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.
Is there an italic variant of this font? Is one coming? This blog post at design.google says "Lexend Italic will be available Spring 2022 from Octavio Pardo." FYI @octaviopardo
See also ThomasJockin/readexpro#21.
Improvements that would make the reduce the cognitive demands of this font for novice readers and those with special needs:
Would it be possible to publish the WOFF2 versions for the other variations? Particularly interested in the Lexend Deca version.
I tried to create them myself but running into issues getting gftools to run on my mac.
Hey :)
Great font! I use it for many projects.
However the font doesn't really work well when using it with -webkit-text-stroke.
Any plans on improving this? Thanks!
Hello!
This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in LexendGiga[wght].ttf
, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.
To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.
The report follows:
Glyph colonmonetary was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in '', [1, 0, 2] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph numbersign was not compatible:
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in 'wght=199.9939', [0, 2, 1, 3] in 'wght=100.0'
Glyph plus was not compatible:
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=199.9939', 1 in 'wght=100.0'; reversed: False
Glyph product was not compatible:
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in 'wght=199.9939', [2, 1, 0] in 'wght=100.0'
Glyph uni20AD was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=199.9939'; reversed: True
Masters: 'wght=199.9939', 'wght=100.0':
Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=199.9939', 1 in 'wght=100.0'; reversed: True
Glyph uni20B1 was not compatible:
Masters: '', 'wght=199.9939':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=199.9939'
Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3] in 'wght=900.0'
This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable
tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please accept our apologies and ignore / close it.
To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
A PHP framework for web artisans
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
Data-Driven Documents codes.
China tencent open source team.