glidergeek / pysoar Goto Github PK

maybe one that can be added to runtime?

multiple functionalities in one:

• split into multiple functions and rename

delete strange +2 indices around competitionday.task, coming from take-off point and general info line

http://www.soaringspot.com/en_gb/open-benelux-gliding-championships-2015/results/class-std-15m-20m-co/task-8-on-2015-05-22/daily

1R did not outland, but PySoar says he did.

• no turnpoint penalties
• ENL?

seems to come from .app distribution, unix distro doesn't show this behavior. unix distro not used since this always pops up terminal. this issue will not be solved in a while since probably tkinter is left and wxpython will be used, enables to solve this issue.

x the time, y the covered distance (of the task) of each flight

initiate phases obj and performance obj once flight obj is created?

(only for first run)

Since AAT functionality is still disabled, it would be nice to give a warning and exit the simulation.

eg JWGC 2015 suffer from this. radius has to be substracted for correct distance.

• Provide feedback on progress of analysis

Might be interesting for GO4, sallandse tweedaagse 2014. Number one position, but very low thermal average compared to number 2

self.b=[] -> b=[], self.b = b , for speed reasons ?

This is only possible with ctrl-c, ctrl-v. Right click doesn't work, but should.

more classifications on dictionary items?
means: add to each performance indicator which special inclusions/exclusions it has, instead of making separate lists.

button is not working

http://www.soaringspot.com/en_gb/s2d2015/results/combi/task-1-on-2015-06-27/daily
pysoar gives 111.69, while soaringspot gives 108.68. This might be due to new commits and function determine_flown_task_distance in general_functions.

for instance http://www.soaringspot.com/en_gb/s2d2015/results/club/task-1-on-2015-06-27/daily
shows clickable competion ids, but the urls are not working and produce 404 errors when clicked.

preferably pysoar gives a message that soaringspot is not working.

maybe by using self.* variables instead of functionals?

validate whether circle and cruise phases are determined correctly. this can be done using skylines for instance.

• eg SA nationals show very high flight speeds ins thermals

The current directory is reset to the home folder, which causes the excel file and other files to be place in home instead of the place where the programm is called.

For instance 13,5m WC.

first check whether folder of competition day exists, then pull html offline. Incorporate ranking list such that offline runs are possible

This is happening for sallandse tweedaagse 2014, club class:
http://www.soaringspot.com/en/sallandse-tweedaagse-2014/results/club/task-1-on-2014-06-21/daily

SU gets an outlanding distance of 89.99km on soaringspot, while pysoar gives 91.04. Minor difference, but still strange.

after analysis, there should be an icon to be clicked which leads you to the folder in which the excel sheet is placed.

open militaire kampioenschappen (OMK) 2015, open class, 4th task:
http://www.soaringspot.com/en_gb/open-militaire-kampioenschappen-zweefvliegen-2015-malden-2015/results/open-klasse/task-4-on-2015-06-04/daily

A2 (ranking 7) does not seem to be analyzed correctly: soaringspot gives an outlanding, while PySoar doesn't. Futhermore the other outlandings do not have the correct distance.
Maybe related to #24 ?

GPS altitude might be too inaccurate to yield proper results for this performance indicator (using height difference between two consecutive fixes. Maybe a warning should be shown when the gps height is used instead of the baro height.

• generalize empty classes for task, race_task and aat
• make parallel task object in competition class (task2 for now)
• replace read_igc task read in functionality
• replace write_task functionality
• test task2: compare values with original task and other variables
• implement correct handling of tasks (not all necessary info in first file)
• replace calls to old variables with calls to task2
• check if everything still works
• remove unused old variables and functions
• rename to task
• extend with trip object
• implement AAT functionalities
• test implementation thoroughly
• remove check which disables AAT

necessary for analysis of non competition flights

Some competitions (e.g. this one) use a start circle instead of a line.
This is not implemented in PySoar, so this results in unexpected behavior. In the case of the example competition, the analysis fails on the last flight. Disasbling this flight has shown that the other flight are also not correctly analyzed.

determine_best_worst has duplicate code (exportClass)

(problem with read igc and filename <--> filepath

This enables a comparison between cruise speed in lift and sink

now only click is enabled

flight X on lak19-21m show errors in flightphases debuglog. end i of several phases are 0.
http://www.soaringspot.com/en_gb/sa-gliding-nationals-2015-welkom-airfield-2015/results/open/task-6-on-2015-12-18/daily
should look into thermal cruise algorithm for error

http://www.soaringspot.com/en_gb/sa-gliding-nationals-2015-welkom-airfield-2015/results/open/task-6-on-2015-12-18/daily
all flights have outlanded, probably last tp missed

task 11, standard class:
http://www.soaringspot.com/en_gb/jwgc2015/results/standard/task-11-on-2015-12-12/daily

GX (ranking 5) doesn't seem to be analyzed correctly: strange values for thermal average, L/D average and thermal time. Problem might be situated in the phasesClass in which the flight is divided into cruise and thermal.

implement a button or similar into pysoar, which makes reporting malfunctioning within the program really simple (opposed to filing issue in github, which might be too technical)

check whether there is a newer standalone version available

• check whether indeed inbetween fixes
• if so -> make linear interpolation?

Start with algorithm for cruise thermal, look at xcsoar as example

add functionality to GUI for showing analysis file in finder
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6631299/python-opening-a-folder-in-explorer-nautilus-mac-thingie
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3520493/python-show-in-finder#3520693

now HC is not analyzed, because then the rank will not be an int, can be solved with string ranking

edit: maybe better to use ints 0, -1, -2 etc for dedicated 'special rankings'
problem with this is when you sort the flights, all HC flights will be ranked first

• which projection is used?
• does this solve the outlanding imprecise distance covered?

to get appropriate packages?