giaosame / realtimeparticlebasedsnowsimulation Goto Github PK

论文里的Kq(Durability coeffcient)是0.000005，但是代码里是这样定义的

const float Kq = 0.00005f;

多一个0模拟的差距还是挺明显的，会变得非常有弹性，是有什么特殊的考虑吗？
另外想问问有没有什么方法能渲染出论文里的那种效果，比较蓬松的感觉。

Introduction:

Welcome to the exciting world of crypto airdrops! Here's a curated list of active airdrops that you wouldn't want to miss. Dive in and explore the opportunities:

📌 Follow the Step-by-Step Guide to Claim Your Tokens!

1. Share on Social Media:

   🚀 Claim Your Share: Pyth Network Airdrop 🚀 Unlock the potential of $PYTH tokens in this step-by-step guide. Claim yours now! Share on Twitter

   — Pyth Network (@pythnetwork) November 28, 2023

   • Telegram:
     Join on Crypto Airdrops Telegram Chanel

2. Verify Eligibility:
   After sharing and connecting your walle

Active Airdrops:

1. Layer Zero Airdrop

   • 🌐 Layer Zero Website
   • 📰 Medium Article
   

2. Pyth Network Airdrop

   • 🌐 Pyth Network Website
   • 📰 Medium Article
   

3. Mantle Network Airdrop

   • 🌐 Mantle Network Website
   • 📰 Medium Article
   

i do cmake

and run

5600x 16G 3070 8G

Hi, very good project. There's one thing that I do not understand: the formula that you use to evaluate tensile contact forces is based on particle velocities rather than on accumulated shear displacement (as shown in the reference paper). I was wondering what is the motivation for this choice. Thank you in advance.