Provide this library as an Antora 3 pipeline extension about antora-lunr HOT 7 CLOSED

I'm excited to see this happening. Before this is merged in, I'd like you to consider my invitation to graduate this project to the Antora organization on GitLab and making it an official extension of the Antora project. If you decide to accept that invitation, I'd like to suggest that we only merge this change in to that instance instead of this one, thus making a clean break between the old and the new.

from antora-lunr.

Fixed in 618c126

Please note that future development will happen on GitLab. This repository will be archived and marked as read-only.

We should probably update the README to explain:

• why the repository is marked as read-only
• where users can find the latest version (compatible with Antora 3+)
• that the extension is now an "official" extension for Antora

@thor if you would like to submit a pull request for that, I would be more than happy to review it 🤗

from antora-lunr.

I'm ready to graduate the project at any time, though I'd like to bring it in as an extension only (perhaps with a new name). (We can still keep the history).

from antora-lunr.

If you decide to accept that invitation, I'd like to suggest that we only merge this change in to that instance instead of this one, thus making a clean break between the old and the new.

That's a good idea. I was actually thinking about how we will manage the transition.
That should indeed make it clear that antora/lunr-extension is the new extension (based on the pipeline feature).

I'm ready to graduate the project at any time, though I'd like to bring it in as an extension only (perhaps with a new name). (We can still keep the history).

Let me know when the repository/project is ready on GitLab 😀

from antora-lunr.

@Mogztter How do you feel about the repository name antora-lunr-extension and the package name @antora/lunr-extension?

Or would you prefer something like antora-lunr-integration?

I definitely think "lunr" instead of "lunrjs" is the right choice since the lunr package is without the "js" part.

from antora-lunr.

How do you feel about the repository name antora-lunr-extension and the package name @antora/lunr-extension?

Perfect.

Or would you prefer something like antora-lunr-integration?

No extension is better as it refers to the pipeline extension (and sounds better).

I definitely think "lunr" instead of "lunrjs" is the right choice since the lunr package is without the "js" part.

I agree 👍🏻

from antora-lunr.

@Mogztter I have set up the new repository. https://gitlab.com/antora/antora-lunr-extension

I could have attempted to import the repository from GitHub, but since the project is being restructured, I figured that might just complicate things. Try to integrate the extension-based branch into the main branch and see how it goes. If something goes sideways, we can start over.

from antora-lunr.