PSA: status of project & looking for maintainers! about fractal HOT 6 OPEN

I'm looking for a tool to be able to display components using atomic design and this one seems to be the most up to date with lesser bloat in third party dependencies. I'm willing to contribute over time. I don't have tons of availability, but find this project needed as an alternative to storybook, that often has a lot of security vulnerabilities. If given some permissions, I can work on updating the dependencies at the very least. I can also take ownership and work on this project now or in the future. Mainly, I was looking for a way to display web components.

from fractal.

Thanks for posting this @mihkeleidast. There's nothing more I'd love than to continue working on Fractal, but it's become incredibly tricky to juggle..well...life.

Unfortunately the pandemic took a lot out of me, and definitely made me re-evaluate some things in my life. One of those things was how much time I really want to spend working for free in the evenings when I could/should be looking after myself (both mentally and physically).

Do I still use Fractal? Yes.

Would I be willing to work on Fractal if we were to enable sponsorship of some kind (either via Github or Open Collective)? Definitely - especially seeing as how the UK is currently run by a bunch of fools who have no idea of how the general public are affected by our current cost of living crisis.

Do I think it's fair to enable sponsorship for Fractal? Yes and no. I always think it's fair for FOSS maintainers to be compensated for time spent working on FOSS; but without a clear roadmap for Fractal that seems a little premature at this point.

from fractal.

@mihkeleidast after seeing this, and loving Fractal our team would be interested to take over development of Fractal.
Is there a direct way to communicate about this? Feel free to give me some information! Thanks

from fractal.

So what's the latest update on this? @TheGameFreak720 and @michtio have expressed interest in helping to maintain this project. Is there any movement on this? Thx!

from fractal.

I worked with Fractal 5 years ago. I really appreciated the approach Atomic design is the right way to go but need systems where through use the wholeness of the compositional approach can reveal the implicate emergent order. Much of the best ideas in this setup seem to live on in Lit.dev. Would be nice to see the system revived and be liberated from the gratuitous complitations that are but rearrangement of a broken wheel. If this comment resonates with anybody I would be glad to be of assistance. I would like to see a system where the fractal approach would revived to power what I like to call Lietate Software as Mutual Learning and a conversation in the Long tail of the Internet where our ability to articulate intents and systems gets the focus it deserves and liberate us from gratiutous complications, compromises that all stems from bad cosmologies and epistemologies that are promoted.

from fractal.

That was difficult to parse, @gyuri-lajos, but I think I get it. [Thank you.]

[My perspective:] I found Fractal to have met my wants (flexibility), but not met the needs of my peers (who need it to be easy to use and grok and contribute to). With it I created a working system, but achieving it via Fractal was difficult and unintuitive, and newcomers to it find the same to be true (though much fault also lies with my implementation).

I hope someone receives the reins of Fractal and maintains some of the flexibility that makes it great, while making it as easy to work with as it initially appears to be — maybe to do so is just adding to documentation 🤷 (I used an undocumented feature or two).

from fractal.