Long delay of fsck for complex filesystem about exfatprogs HOT 10 CLOSED

Hello @hyeongseok-kim901,
The size needs to be changed. and I consider read-ahead and stoping the travel when the marker is met.
Thank you.

from exfatprogs.

@hclee ,
Great !! Good to hear that.
When will it be released, v1.0.4 ? Do you have schedule? roughly?

from exfatprogs.

@hyeongseok-kim901,
Sorry for the late reply.
I did the pull request #119 to solve this issues. Could you test it?
And we will release the next version within the next week.

from exfatprogs.

@hclee ,
Thanks. Improved.
Tested in approximately 20000 dir entried filesystem.
It read 2.7GB vs 1.2GB (current vs next), and took time as a half.

The request count is double of the current version, (21350 vs 40449)
and yes maybe it is due to reduce the request size.

Anyway, it have been improved, and I think it's good.

from exfatprogs.

@hyeongseok-kim901 Could you please share performance difference with other fsck utils ?

from exfatprogs.

@namjaejeon ,
I have shared performace data with @hclee , current vs next and including other commercial exfat tool.
Can you please discuss with him?
I can't currently look into the next version's changes in detail.
Thanks.

from exfatprogs.

@hyeongseok-kim901 Okay! Thanks!

from exfatprogs.

@hyeongseok-kim901
We decreased the elapsed time. the time decreases from 24.95 seconds to 11.63 seconds in our test environment where we fill Samsung 64GB UHS-I sdcard with 9947 directories and 16504 files by fsstress.
If you want to check this, you can apply #122

from exfatprogs.

@hyeongseok-kim901,
Could I close this issue?

from exfatprogs.

@hclee ,
Sorry for the late reply.
Sure, I think it's OK to close, I've checked the improvement.
Thanks.

from exfatprogs.