Dear all, I try to solve the first Fortran exercise and this is my (presumably correct) version:

module hello_world
contains
  function hello()
    character(13) :: hello
    hello = "Hello, World!"
  end function hello
end module hello_world

It passes all tests locally (GNU 11) but in the online editor I get:

An error occurred while running your tests. This might mean that there was an issue in our infrastructure, or it might mean that you have something in your code that's causing our systems to break.

Please check your code, and if nothing seems to be wrong, try running the tests again.

If I introduce errors in the code I get correct compiler messages. I do not know what else to try or if the runner is broken somehow.

Test Runner should provide Test output. Below a good hint from Angelika:
_
I just want to say, that the test runner would need to be adjusted to output fields tests[].output and tests[].message, example:_ https://github.com/exercism/docs/blob/main/building/tooling/test-runners/interface.md#v2-example

If possible, this test runner should be updated to version 3 of the test runner interface specification. In version 3, one additional feature is enabled: the ability to link individual tests to tasks. This allows the website to show which tests belong to which tasks.

The way tests are linked to tasks is via an (optional) task_id field, which is an integer that matches the number of the task as defined in the exercise's instructions.md file (note: the instructions start at index 1).

This is an example of a test in the results.json file:

{
  "name": "Expected oven time in minutes",
  "status": "pass",
  "task_id": 1,
  "test_code": "Assert.Equal(40, Lasagna.ExpectedMinutesInOven());"
}

You are completely free in how to implement this. Some options are:

1. Add metadata to a test that the test runner can then discover while running the tests (e.g. an attribute or annotation)
2. Define a test name/task id mapping (e.g. in the exercise's .meta/config.json file)
3. Any other option you can think of...

Let me know if there are any questions.

Because the newlines are escaped(?)

For example: