Use 'onChange' rather than 'onBlur' for select elements to trigger validation about elm-form HOT 8 CLOSED

Yes, would also strongly prefer a immediate feedback.

@etaque I think you agreed already on the elm-discuss, but allow me to corroborate the argument.

Simple use case: A sign-in form with fields for username, password and a button.
Both input fields needs to be filled in. The button shall be disabled as long as the form doesn't validate.

Now assume the user has filled in the fields. For now she still has to blur the last field for the button to become enabled. She cannot simply click on the button.

from elm-form.

I do agree. Although we need to find a solution that doesn't show error message on each keypress ; for that we can decorrelate validation and error printing so submit button is clickable, or throttle validation (but that would imply changing the update signature I believe).

Would gladly accept a PR, I'm short in time for my packages these days :)

from elm-form.

Thank you, etaque!

Maybe I can dig into the issue after my short term project is finished (presumably next week).
But I cannot make a promise.

from elm-form.

I have a working implementation in this branch:
https://github.com/etaque/elm-simple-form/tree/specialized-fields

Example looks good but I haven't tested it more seriously, I should be able to publish it tomorrow if it's good for you.

from elm-form.

At first glance, looks to work. I see you are now exposing the Actions explicitly and have retired the functions that create them. This is going to allow me to drop one of my ports :-)

from elm-form.

I think it's good. Closing, I'll release 2.0.0 tomorrow.

from elm-form.

@simonh1000 @ThomasWeiser 2.0.0 is out!

from elm-form.

Fab - thanks

from elm-form.