Rename framework from ReceiptKit to Receipt about apple-receipt HOT 6 OPEN

@derpoliuk I'm all for adding something to Receipt but Kit is as specific as Utils. It says almost nothing.

from apple-receipt.

@salutis What's the main argument why should we remove "Kit" suffix in the first place?

from apple-receipt.

@andris-zalitis Does it add anything? Compare: import Receipt and import ReceiptKit.

from apple-receipt.

In my mind ReceitpKit means something to work with receipt. Receipt means just receipt.

from apple-receipt.

@salutis

Does it add anything? Compare: import Receipt and import ReceiptKit.

I think it does add. It adds the information that you're not importing a model of a Receipt, but importing some functionality that will deal with Receipts.

I'm all for adding something to Receipt but Kit is as specific as Utils. It says almost nothing.

I agree with you that Utils is as good as Kit judging by the meaning that it adds, however in my opinion Kit is a bit better for other reasons:

• Utils is a shortening of Utilities while Kit is a short sweet word
• Apple uses Kit a lot

from apple-receipt.

@andris-zalitis

I think it does add. It adds the information that you're not importing a model of a Receipt, but importing some functionality that will deal with Receipts.

Same can be said about Apple's "Media Player" framework (MediaPlayer.framework). The import statement imports frameworks, not types.

Also, Kit implies that one can do various things with the Receipt which is not true. There're no tools in this "kit".

Anyway...

Whatever we do, we need to fix this so that the repository name matches the framework.

from apple-receipt.