drakeasberry / dissertation Goto Github PK

Segmentation still includes Participants 044 and 047 which should be eliminated from analysis due to background factors making them not fit any of the study populations.

The by target analysis was the more clear direction to display statistics. These were not updated with cleaner code, cohen's d analysis, etc post 11 NOV 2020. Update these later (After dissertation is written)

Effect names used in code do not match prose and are very long. This is also causing the table to be wider than manuscript text and extending into the margin area on right side of page.

You may find this useful at some point if you haven't already seen this.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/13jp0QAqQeFlYSjeZS0fDInvgaDzBXjGQNe4VNKbbNHQ/mobilebasic

Paperpile export of citations not working. Paper will not compile

Since the change to knitr compiles uses .rnw files instead of .tex, the README file should be updated to reflect these changes.

How do I correctly report results of power analysis? Used recruitment section of Sampling Chapter.

Need to review to R stats to integrate with LaTeX document

I cannot force the full alignment. When words are long or attached to an m-dash, it breaks the right side margin line.

Can't get the rscript to run

Unable to format phonetic symbols correctly. square brackets [ ] are the first problem, but this is likely to be bigger than this.

Need to know how long experiment runs to place in IRB and Prolific.

Lexical access experiment had timing issues for participants completing the experiment in their first visit to the lab. This did not affect anyone completing the Segmentation experiment or participants who returned for a second visit to the lab to complete the Lexical Access experiment.

I can see clearly that changes are being pushed based on commits in gitlab but the changes are not reflected at runtime.

Reference format not APA style

References are populating after Appendices and this order needs to be reversed.

I have read the latest version of your Chapter 2 (Sampling Methods and Populations). It all looks good. What remains is very minor, like a few typos, misplaced comas, and two or three ungrammatical sentences. It’s all good. The chapter is ready for defense.

Will need to check and fix these issues after defense, but before final manuscript submission.

In pavlovia, the participants have the option to not answer. You can place an asterisks *at the end of text and it will require an answer.

Code is producing 64 individual experiment files by experimental block in Statistics/Monolingual_lemma/analyze_data that seems unneeded.

Testing issues with using Prolific for participant recruitment.

Original experiment was ran completely random meaning the carrier item could have been the first item in the list.

1. How many occurrences of this took place? overall and by participant?
2. Does this make a difference in the effect?