Git Product home page Git Product logo

azdev-release-orchestrator's People

Contributors

alexalnaib avatar dmitryserbin avatar johnlokerse avatar kacpermm avatar luniclynx avatar pamontag avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar

azdev-release-orchestrator's Issues

V3 task with parameters fails Contribution/HierarchyQuery API call

Hello,

I'm having an issue implementing the V3 task with parameters specifically within an integrated project (my repos/pipelines are in the same azdo project). Without parameters, my child target pipeline triggers successfully and everything works wonderfully. With parameters, the call to get the target pipelines parameters times out after 10 attempts with the same message:

2022-05-11T16:17:31.754Z release-orchestrator:Retry:retryAsync Error: Unable to retrieve <policy> (63) run parameters
    at BuildWebApiRetry.getRunParameters (/home/vsts/work/_tasks/releaseorchestrator_5d38d46b-4c0a-4c14-8f0c-04df59e4dc27/3.0.1592/extensions/buildwebapiretry/buildwebapiretry.js:74:19)
    at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:68:7)
2022-05-11T16:17:41.764Z release-orchestrator:ApiClient:post Making <[https://dev.azure.com/<redacted>//_apis/Contribution/HierarchyQuery/project/<redacted>](https://dev.azure.com/<redacted>//_apis/Contribution/HierarchyQuery/project/<redacted>) API <POST> call
2022-05-11T16:17:41.874Z release-orchestrator:BuildWebApiRetry: { dataProviderExceptions:
   { 'ms.vss-build-web.pipeline-run-parameters-data-provider':
      { exceptionType: 'ResourceValidationException',
        message:
         'The repository policy in project <redacted> could not be retrieved. Verify the name and credentials being used.',
        stackTrace: null } },
  dataProviderSharedData:
   { _featureFlags: { 'Build2.DisableRunTimeVariableEdit': false } },
  dataProviders:
   { 'ms.vss-web.component-data': {},
     'ms.vss-web.shared-data': null } }

After 10 tries:

##[error]Failed retrying <getRunParameters> for <10> times. Error: Unable to retrieve <policy> (63) run parameters

Here is the code block from pipeline:

  - stage: policyPipe
    displayName: Initiate Policy Pipeline
    condition: |
      and(
        eq(variables['Build.Reason'], 'Manual'),
        eq('${{ parameters.initateAllPipes }}', 'true')
      )
    jobs:
    - job:
      steps:
      - task: releaseorchestrator@3
        displayName: Kickoff pipeline 
        inputs:
          projectName: $(System.TeamProject)
          definitionName: policy
          branchName: ${{ parameters.policyRefName }}
          strategy: new
          parameters: applyTerraform=${{ parameters.applyTerraform }}

Verified that our build service has all the requisite permissions per your v3 docs. Again, everything works like a charm without parameters specified.

Feature request: Approve only strategy

could you add a new strategy that is just approval? This would be very useful because when you have microservices and releases are generated, not always to deploy all the microservices, but only those that are pending approval because they had any changes
On the other hand, the Release Definition, it would be good to be able to select more than one, for example with a field separated by commas, for the same reason, that I mentioned above

Error installing the extension to Azure DevOps Server 2020

The error we are seeing when we attempt to upload the extension to Azure DevOps Server, is "Extension validation error
Task definition input 'strategy' and Task definition input 'proceedSkippedStages' must belong to same group as they are dependent inputs for Task with ID '5d38d46b-4c0a-4c14-8f0c-04df59e4dc27'."

Could you advise what this means and what is needed to resolve it?

On-prem Azure DevOps task V2 error

I am receiving an error when trying to run the version 2 task.
"Cannot read property 'value' of null"

This is for all possible combinations of inputs to the task that I can think of.

This is for an On-Premise version of Azure DevOps.

Specific run - buildNumber vs buildName

Hi,
looking into docs (here) to execute a specific pipeline version, in the YAML example you show to use:
buildNumber: <value>

You write also:

Parameter Description
buildNumber Target build number (i.e. build name)

But the field buildNumber is not recognized as valid and after some research, the right field must be:
buildName: <value>

It's only a documentation error?

Release Orchestration Between Organizations

Can this work as a trigger for a pipeline on a different organization? Say, I import the repository of OrgB (source) to OrgA (copy). if OrgB updated the source repo, in OrgA, does the imported repo (copy) get updated automatically? If not, do you know of any other workaround for this topic ?

Dropdown selection with variables

This task has been so great! We use it heavily.

We came across a minor issue where the Release Definition we pass in a variable like $(Release). This works when the value of this variable are the definition ID. However, if you pass in the release name, even though it actually exists in the dropdown, the task fails. Can this please be fixed?

Calling a release that uses the same Agent

I have a release that uses the orchestrator to call another release; both of which uses the same Agent.

Problem is that it seems to be blocking in a deadlock as the first release is waiting for the second to complete but in order for the second to start it needs to wait for the Agent to be freed up; or it seems to be this way as it gets stuck on that step for a long time.

Is this true? And is there any way to mitigate this besides allocating to different Agents (which we currently do not have)

Unable to use ID for target release & definition parameters

When upgrading from v1 to v2 i noticed that when using Specific Release option it is not possible to supply the specific ReleaseID, it fails saying not found. We supply the specific release via a variable which corresponds to the unique release ID, so are unable to upgrade for the specific release scenario.

Also, when specifying release definition, we had switched to using IDs for v1 and now it appears only to accept the Name, this means if the name of the releae definition changes through an edit it could fail.

would be good in all circumstances to allow specific ids for specific releases and definitions.

ReleaseOrchestrator stucked in "in progress" state on MAIN Release

Hello,

Frequently ReleaseOrchestrator stucked in "in progress" state on MAIN Release (the Release where this task is added to).

In Release report console I can see that triggered Release has been finished successfully :

2019-03-20T08:06:36.9903054Z Release automatically started as stages deployment conditions are met
2019-03-20T08:07:17.4058074Z Stage (15677) deployment completed with status
2019-03-20T08:07:17.4059090Z Phase completed with status

but "MAIN" Release which triggers this external Release stucked at:

image

and when Timeout occurs MAIN Release just fails.

OrchestratorV2 throws error if definitionName is classic pipeline definition ID number

Hi Dimitry, first of all, thank you for this extension: It is very useful.

Context: I have a YAML pipeline which use the orchestrator@2 task to approve a release in a classic release pipeline.

According to specification, definition name can be also the ID of the pipeline.

Tasks/OrchestratorV2/task.json

{
  "name": "definitionName",
  "type": "pickList",
  "label": "Definition name",
  "helpMarkDown": "Target release definition name or ID",
  "required": true,
  "properties": {
    "EditableOptions": true
  }
}

If the numeric ID of the pipeline is passed as an argument the task fails.

2023-06-08T16:25:10.093Z release-orchestrator:TaskHelper:getParameters { releaseType: 'Specific',
  projectName: '<OMITTED>',
  definitionName: '443',
  releaseName: '0.84.230531.1-R1',
  stages: [ 'Tier2' ],
  variables: [],
  filters:
   { releaseTags: [],
     artifactTags: [],
     artifactVersion: '',
     artifactBranch: '',
     stageStatuses: [] },
...
release-orchestrator:Retry:retryable Executing <getReleaseDefinitions> with <10> retries
release-orchestrator:ReleaseHelper:getDefinition []
release-orchestrator:TaskHelper:fail Task <Failed> result (ignore failure <false>)
##[debug]task result: Failed
##[error]Definition <443> not found

I searched in the code and the issue could be in
Tasks/OrchestratorV2/helpers/releasehelper.ts

public async getDefinition(projectName: string, definitionName: string): Promise<ReleaseDefinition> {

    const debug = this.debugLogger.extend(this.getDefinition.name);

    const matchingDefinitions: ReleaseDefinition[] = await this.releaseApi.getReleaseDefinitions(
        projectName,
        definitionName,
        undefined,
        undefined,
        undefined,
        undefined,
        undefined,
        undefined,
        undefined,
        true);

    debug(matchingDefinitions.map(
        (definition) => `${definition.name} (${definition.id})`));

    if (matchingDefinitions.length <= 0) {

        throw new Error(`Definition <${definitionName}> not found`);

    }

    const targetDefinition: ReleaseDefinition = await this.releaseApi.getReleaseDefinition(
        projectName,
        matchingDefinitions[0].id!);

    debug(targetDefinition);

    return targetDefinition;

}

In case you would like code contribution, I am interested in working together for a solution.

Best
Matteo

Error after build 2.0.1846: Cannot read property 'trim' of undefined

Starting from 10/31/2022 I got the following error in our release when calling Release Orchestrator with version 2.0.1846.
[error]Cannot read property 'trim' of undefined

The same release worked the day before where the build version was 2.0.1663.

Is it a bug or do we need to update some configuration in the release?

Thanks,
Zhou

2022-10-31T13:48:54.3870663Z ##[section]Starting: Release Orchestrator
2022-10-31T13:48:54.4047329Z ==============================================================================
2022-10-31T13:48:54.4047726Z Task : Release Orchestrator
2022-10-31T13:48:54.4048048Z Description : Manage and orchestrate Azure DevOps release pipelines
2022-10-31T13:48:54.4048320Z Version : 2.0.1846
2022-10-31T13:48:54.4048521Z Author : Dmitry Serbin
2022-10-31T13:48:54.4049005Z Help : For aditional information and support please refer to https://github.com/dmitryserbin/azdev-release-orchestrator project repository
2022-10-31T13:48:54.4049521Z ==============================================================================
2022-10-31T13:48:55.0261713Z ##[error]Cannot read property 'trim' of undefined
2022-10-31T13:48:55.0419919Z ##[section]Finishing: Release Orchestrator

Endpoint not present: SystemVssConnection on *nix build agents

It seems that the SystemVssConnection is case sensitive on *nix systems - I was able to get it to work on a windows agent, but when running on an OSX agent it throws that error. All uses I have found in the Microsoft/azure-pipelines-tasks tests seems to have it in uppercase - so perhaps changing it to SYSTEMVSSCONNECTION would help this to be a cross-platform tool.

Related issue: geeklearningio/gl-vsts-tasks-inception#9 (comment)

Here is my debug log from testing:

2019-03-19T22:43:21.6480150Z ##[debug]agent.TempDirectory=/Users/Shared/myagent/_work/_temp
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6480700Z ##[debug]loading inputs and endpoints
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6480820Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_ENDPOINTTYPE
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6481010Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_TARGETPROJECT
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6481070Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_TARGETDEFINITION
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6481180Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_RELEASESTRATEGY
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6481230Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_TARGETRELEASE
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6481420Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_TARGETRELEASESTAGES
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6481560Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_RELEASETAGFILTER
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6481610Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_ARTIFACTTAGFILTER
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6481720Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_SOURCEBRANCHFILTER
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6481770Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_SOURCEBRANCHNAME
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6481870Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_ARTIFACTSTRATEGY
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6481930Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_TARGETARTIFACT
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6481980Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_TARGETARTIFACTVERSION
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6482140Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_STAGESTRATEGY
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6482190Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_TARGETDEFINITIONSTAGES
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6482290Z ##[debug]loading INPUT_IGNOREFAILURE
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6482350Z ##[debug]loading ENDPOINT_AUTH_SYSTEMVSSCONNECTION
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6482400Z ##[debug]loading ENDPOINT_AUTH_SCHEME_SYSTEMVSSCONNECTION
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6482520Z ##[debug]loading ENDPOINT_AUTH_PARAMETER_SYSTEMVSSCONNECTION_ACCESSTOKEN
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6482570Z ##[debug]loaded 19
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6483180Z ##[debug]Agent.ProxyUrl=undefined
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6483240Z ##[debug]Agent.CAInfo=undefined
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6483350Z ##[debug]Agent.ClientCert=undefined
2019-03-19T22:43:21.6483410Z ##[debug]Agent.SkipCertValidation=undefined
2019-03-19T22:43:21.7836810Z ##[debug]EndpointType=integrated
2019-03-19T22:43:21.7859230Z ##[debug]IgnoreFailure=false
2019-03-19T22:43:21.7860890Z ##[debug]task result: Failed
2019-03-19T22:43:21.7911930Z ##[error]Endpoint not present: SystemVssConnection
2019-03-19T22:43:21.7922130Z ##[debug]Processed: ##vso[task.issue type=error;]Endpoint not present: SystemVssConnection
2019-03-19T22:43:21.7939750Z ##[debug]Processed: ##vso[task.complete result=Failed;]Endpoint not present: SystemVssConnection

I was not able to get any further to see if there are other places it might fail on a non-windows box.

Variable scope on release pipeline?

Hi,
I don't see an option to set a variable scope when defining variables for a release pipeline. From previous experience with the API, it assumes variable scope is "Release", when some variables are sometimes scoped to specific stages.

Has anyone tested this?

Thanks

getStages use displayName instead of stage name

I called different stages in a multistage environment and it didn't work. So, I set the debug flag and the function "getStages" respone a list of displayNames instead of stage names.

Screenshot 2022-08-09 113844

I think this behavior is wrong

Creating Release with Specific Source Version or Build Number

Hi,

I've managed to get the extension to trigger a release against a specific branch but I want to be able to specify a specific build of that branch. I've tried using the Build Number of the build I want and the Source Version (i.e. Git commit hash) but I always get the message that no builds matching the filter can be found.

Is it possible to do this? I could just be using the wrong YAML parameters.

Feature request: Strategy with "no wait" task + "wait only" task

Hi,

I would like to propose a potential enhancement.

Can it be possible to have a strategy with a "no wait" task + a "wait only" task.

The idea is to have the possibility to start multiple release deployment first and then wait all completions at a later stage.

This to allow parallelization and reduce global deployment time when multiple agents are available.

Thank you

Random error - Unable to get release progress

Hi,

I randomly get the error "Unable to get XXX release progress" on release orchestrator tasks during deployment.

The setup of my task is:

  • Endpoint type: Integrated Endpoint
  • Release strategy: Latest Release
  • Filter release tag: Unchecked
  • Filter artifact tag: Unchecked
  • Filter source branch: Checked
  • Ignore Failure: Unchecked
  • Continue on error: Unchecked
  • Timeout: 0

My release pipeline is just a succession of orchestrator tasks with the same setup (except the release definition name for sure).

Attached, the log:
Error.log

If I redeploy the release, it pass (or randomly failed on another release orchestrator deployment task).

When the error occurs, if I check the targeted release, it was successfully deployed.

Regards

[error]name is not defined

Hi,
I got ##[error]name is not defined error when trying to re-deploy a release from Build Definition.
Please help if you have a solution to fix this issue

Security issues with this extensions

Can this be upgraded?
CVE-2022-0144: shelljs is vulnerable to Improper Privilege Management
CVE-2022-24785: Moment.js is a JavaScript date library for parsing, validating, manipulating, and formatting dates. A path traversal vulnerability impacts npm (server) users of Moment.js between versions 1.0.1 and 2.29.1, especially if a user-provided locale string is directly used to switch moment locale. This problem is patched in 2.29.2, and the patch can be applied to all affected versions. As a workaround, sanitize the user-provided locale name before passing it to Moment.js.
CVE-2022-31129: moment is a JavaScript date library for parsing, validating, manipulating, and formatting dates. Affected versions of moment were found to use an inefficient parsing algorithm. Specifically using string-to-date parsing in moment (more specifically rfc2822 parsing, which is tried by default) has quadratic (N^2) complexity on specific inputs. Users may notice a noticeable slowdown is observed with inputs above 10k characters. Users who pass user-provided strings without sanity length checks to moment constructor are vulnerable to (Re)DoS attacks. The problem is patched in 2.29.4, the patch can be applied to all affected versions with minimal tweaking. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should consider limiting date lengths accepted from user input.
CVE-2021-3807: ansi-regex is vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
CVE-2021-23358: The package underscore from 1.13.0-0 and before 1.13.0-2, from 1.3.2 and before 1.12.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Injection via the template function, particularly when a variable property is passed as an argument as it is not sanitized.

Partially Succeeded as last step of release hangs orchestration release

I have a release that Partially Succeeded, and when I invoke that release from my orchestration release pipeline, it never completes. I let it wait overnight to see if it was just some timing issue and it never resolved.

Details:

  • has 4 releases before it in the pipeline
  • Integrated Endpoint (same project)
  • Create Release
  • Filter Definition Stages -> single stage
  • Filter Artifact Tag
  • Source Branch Name -> ref/heads/master

Step that caused the partial success (it is the last task):

  • Visual Studio Test -> Test run for Test plans (4 errors, 3 warnings)

Feature Request: Add an override for the description of a release

Can we have an override for the description on the triggered/created release so that I can insert pipeline variables, like a link back to the source pipeline, or the
$(Release.DefinitionName)
so I know which pipeline triggered this pipeline, in addition to the
$(Release.ReleaseName).

A quick glance looks like this is assigned on line 205 @
https://github.com/dmitryserbin/azdev-release-orchestrator/blob/master/Tasks/OrchestratorV2/helpers/releasehelper.ts

But would need additional options added to the module.

Release Orchestration

I have two different Release pipeline. In one pipeline using Release Orchestration agent to call second release pipeline . When we execute first Release pipeline the second release pipeline is showing "Waiting for running jobs to finish".

Please let me know how to fix this issue.

Waiting for review - comment support

Hi,
testing the plugin, I didn't find a way to fill the Comment (optional) field into Waiting for review form.
image

Looking into your code, seem you support the field through the code because you pass them to the azure library, but seems the plugin does not provide a way to insert it in the orchestration pipeline written with the plugin.
Do you agree with the analysis?
Can you add the support?

Feature Request: Add option to skip task when no release is found

Would it be possible to mark the task as skipped if no release is found that matches the search criteria?

We have a micro-service architecture and not every service has a release to go all the time. So marking the task as partially complete looks like there were deployment issues when a release was never run. Marking the the task as Skipped with an appropriate message allows our release team to focus on any real failures.

Unable to get release status

Hi,

I have an issue with the orchestrator tasks. Randomly, the execution failed with the error "Unable to get release status". It append approximatively for 50% of our executions. Especially for long running tasks (but not only).

I checked the source code and, based on debug logs, it seems that the method "releaseApi.getRelease" in function "getReleaseStatus" of "releasehelper.ts" don't fail but return an empty "Release" object. Like if the API response is a 200 OK but the response can't be parsed into a "Release" object. It seems to be a 200 OK because there is no debug logs coming from the "Retryable".

Orchestrator version : 2.0.846
Task version: 2.0
Mode: Deploy latest release with stage and branch filter

Thank you
tasklog_10.log

Feature request: Custom artifact name and version

Rather than specifying a filter to define what artifacts to use when running a new release, it would be helpful to specify the artifacts to use directly in the release that is running the release orchestrator task.

Certainly in our case this would be helpful as we are not tagging our artifacts.

Please consider adding this feature

Enhancement request: Stop release upon Approval failure

Hello, Is it possible to end the release once it hits "Stage <Stage 1> (129) cannot be approved by (Project Collection Build Service)"

It seems to be retrying forever.

I just want to trigger the release and let others manually approve.

Thank you

Option to "Set and Forget" orchestrations... instead of waiting for them to finish.

The fact that the Orchestrator step holds an agent hostage while waiting for the child task to complete creates some issues, especially when using them for parallel deployment of many services. We have a pool of 10 agents, if I have 7 services all deploying in parallel we encounter an issue where 7 Orchestrator steps are holding up 7 agents... leaving only 3 to do the actual work. If it were 10 services, the orchestrator pipeline would just sit and spin until timeouts, because there would never be any agents left to actually do the work. A simple solution for this is to have an option to use the orchestrator to just START the child pipeline, but not sit and monitor it's status/wait for it to finish... just set it and forget it.

Using Latest Release with Filtered Source Branch triggers old deploys

I attempted to use a configure the task to use Filter Source Branch with Latest Release as follows:

Capture

Unfortunately it started triggering deployments for the oldest, not the newest release when i used develop branch on my component.

I found it used the latest release if i removed the Filter Source Branch, but i would really like to use this to deploy a specific release based on the branch of artifacts.

Can you provide a reason as to why the very latest release would not be used when specifying Filter Source Branch?

Feature request: Cancel triggered releases

If I cancel the release pipeline which is using release orchestrator is there a way I could use release orchestrator to propagate the cancellation to any releases it triggered? I don't want to leave around lots of zombie child releases consuming resources or waiting for manual approvals which no longer matter because the orchestration job was cancelled/abandoned.

I presumably would need a separate invocation of the task with a custom condition to run always (ie even if previous tasks failed) which knows the release IDs of the triggered releases to send cancel events to?

No aritfact version id is specified corresponding to artifact source

Hello,

Thanks for your extension which looks really promising. However when I try to Create Release with following settings:

image

I have following error:

VS402962: No artifact version id is specified corresponding to artifact source 'Source-Alias'. Specify a valid value and try again.

Moreover when I choose "Artifacts Strategy" with "Specific Artifacts" I can see list of Artiffacts linked to Release Definition. Issue only occurs when I choose "Create Release" with "Default Artifacts"

Version on Premise: TFS 2018 Update.3

Unable to use variable for release definition

We are finding that we cannot use a variable for the Release Definition field and must slect from the drop down. As we have many releases we wanted to use your task within a re-usable task group rather than having to clone it many times and hard code the release definition selection.
We get the following error:

##[error]Unable to create new release. TypeError: Cannot read property 'map' of undefined

It would be good to understand if this is supposed to be supported or if it's a know issue?

specify build for all pipelines

Hi

I want to select the build number and then this build must be used by the remote pipelines.
In my test I select the build which downloads the correct artifacts, but the remote build uses the latest build instead.

How can I pass the build to all the remote pipelines I trigger?

Thanks
Jacques

[error]No <RELEASE_DEFINITION> artifact matching filter (version: undefined, branch: master) criteria found

image

Hello,

When using these settings, the error 'No <THE_NAME_OF_THE_RELEASE_DEFINITION> artifact matching filter (version: undefined, branch: master) criteria found' is thrown. Could you make it possible to implicitly use the latest version of the selected branch? Or make it possible to choose between the latest version or a manually defined version?

The problem is that for the moment, the option of filtering the source branch does not work at all.

Best regards

Stage names containing spaces and commas - Suggestions?

Hi! Truly a gem of a task for people who need to orchestrate a lot of pipelines!

Any suggestion how to handle stage names with commas and spaces in the name ๐Ÿ™ˆ ? Is this supported? E.g.: ''Build, Test, Dockerize & Pack"

I add a "reproducible" example below.

Yaml task definition:

        steps:
          - ${{ each value in parameters.Pipelines }}:
            - task: releaseorchestrator@3
              displayName: Orchestrate services deployment
              inputs:
                projectName: "Cloud Team"
                definitionName: ${{ value }}
                strategy: ${{ parameters.Strategy }}
                stages: ''Build, Test, Dockerize & Pack"
                branchName: ${{ parameters.Branch }}

Debug log from a run of the orchestrator:

2022-06-29T11:28:20.079Z release-orchestrator:BuildSelector:getStages [ 'Build, Test, Dockerize & Pack',
  'Release to ***',
  'Release to ***',
  'Release to ***',
  'Release to ***',
  'Release ***' ]
##[debug]ignoreFailure=false
##[debug]task result: Failed
##[error]Definition <***> (***) does not contain <Build> stage
##[debug]Processed: ##vso[task.issue type=error;]Definition <***> (***) does not contain <Build> stage
2022-06-29T11:28:20.081Z release-orchestrator:TaskHelper:fail Task <Failed> result (ignore failure <false>)
##[debug]Processed: ##vso[task.complete result=Failed;]Definition <***> (307) does not contain <***> stage
Finishing: Orchestrate service deployment

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.