"Due to", the exceptional case handled in PostProcessor about processors HOT 2 OPEN

Thanks @kwalcock !

I've assumed "due" is a preposition... If it's tagged as JJ that is fine. We just need to adjust the postprocessing rule for this.
Also, note that, theoretically, the ambiguity you mentioned ("because of" vs. "scheduled to") should be resolved through syntax, which, hopefully, our rules do. It is Ok to leave this ambiguity in at POS tag level.

Similarly, the words in between "due" and "to" should be modeled by Odin rules.

from processors.

It sounds like the POS is not the important part. Using JJ might be somewhat faster because it is more likely to start like that and need less rewriting, but the cost is trivial and compatibility might be important. It must be the dependency that is the focus and the goal to get that mwe (multi-word expression?) edge in there. The training data for it looks very inconsistent. It seems like the result could be slightly improved if the mwe edge were also added if "due to" wasn't necessarily consecutive and not added if the due means scheduled. It looks like the code can't be removed, though, and that was what I was hoping for. Oh well. It's easy enough.

from processors.