caseywdunn / course_bio_philosophy Goto Github PK

Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology
https://www.amazon.com/Everything-Flows-Towards-Processual-Philosophy/dp/0198779631/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1551919201&sr=1-1-fkmrnull

Individuation, Process, and Scientific Practices
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0190636815/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o08_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Sounds awesome! It's a tough question because it's a diffuse field where authors often seem unaware of each other and there are few "great" texts that are absolutely fundamental.

If I had to pick three, I’d say Aristotle, Darwin, and, Monod’s Chance and Necessity. For Aristotle, do De Anima using Bolotin’s translation. If you don’t want to do the old man himself, check out Hassing’s Final Causality in Nature and Human Affairs.

Allan Gotthelf, Marjorie Grene, and James Lennox are also good Aristotle commentators.

For later pre-Darwinists: Owen and Lamarck. Hans Driesch would be good, given who's teaching :) I also like John Dewey’s essay “Darwin’s influence on philosophy.”

The modern synthesis writers: Dobzhansky ed. Studies in the Phil. of Biol. Mayr (anything). Got to do Simpson: Crisis in Biology and/or Status of the Study of Organisms.

Maybe Lewontin: Analysis of Variance; Triple Helix; Spandrels.

There are plenty of newer writers (Ruth Millikan, Karen Neander). One sees the same sorts of themes (parts and wholes, teleology, chance) over and over and the newer folks are more straight up academic philosophy, which can be tough.

One outlier is Hans Jonas. You'd have to read him first and decide whether you like him and whether he fits.

Everything flows -
https://www.nyrb.com/products/everything-flows?variant=1094929545

Nancy Cartwright - How the laws of physics lie https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0198247001/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_hsch_vapi_taft_p1_i3