PouchDB adapter using ReactNative SQLite as its backing store.

SQLite storage performs much faster than AsyncStorage, especially with secondary index. Here is benchmark results:

• Device: iPhone 6s
• Documents: 434
• Update seq: 453
• Iterations: 100
• Used options: { include_docs: true }

• Device: iPad Pro 9.7" (Simulator) - iOS 10.3.2
• Documents: 5000

• allDocs options: { include_docs: true, attachments: true }
• Using this test script

• pouchdb-react-native
• A SQLite module
  • react-native-sqlite-2 (recommended)
  • react-native-sqlite-storage

Install from npm:

npm install pouchdb-react-native pouchdb-adapter-react-native-sqlite --save
react-native install react-native-sqlite-2

Then import it, notify PouchDB of the plugin, and initialize a database using the react-native-sqlite adapter name:

import PouchDB from 'pouchdb-react-native'
import SQLite from 'react-native-sqlite-2'
import SQLiteAdapterFactory from 'pouchdb-adapter-react-native-sqlite'

const SQLiteAdapter = SQLiteAdapterFactory(SQLite)
PouchDB.plugin(SQLiteAdapter)
const db = new PouchDB('mydb.db', {adapter: 'react-native-sqlite'});

• 1.0.3
  • Remove pouchdb-utils dependency
• 1.0.2
  • Upgrade pouchdb-util & pouchdb-adapter-websql-core to 6.2.0
  • Update benchmark result
• 1.0.1
  • Remove unnecessary console output
• 1.0.0
  • Initial release