Final project for ECON 326. My collaborators on this project (alphabetically) were Bryn Griffiths, Raven Kirkwood, and Aleena Sharma.
We study Canadian and American coronavirus data to test two hypotheses:
-
The
R_0
for Canada falls within the interval [2.06-2.52]. (This number comes from a Zhang et al analysis on the Diamond Princess outbreak.) -
Canada "responded better" to the pandemic than the US, since the WHO declared a pandemic. (We quantify this by looking at the reduction in
R_0
over the two regimes.)
For (1), we use a simple linear autoregression x_{t+5} = R_0 x_t + e
, and examine it afterwords for serial correlation effects (since, e.g., the datapoint (x_0, x_5)
and the point (x_5, x_10)
are correlated through their shared dependence on x_5
).
For (2), we test a hypothesis on the quantity D_canada - D_US
, where D_X
is the difference in R_0
values for the pre- and post-pandemic regimes for country X.
The data itself is a transformed version of the JHU COVID tracker, frozen April 6th.
The source repo is available here (commit c8d69b5
). It's a time-series (JSON format) of relevant information by country and day. For ex:
"Thailand": [
{
"date": "2020-1-22",
"confirmed": 2,
"deaths": 0,
"recovered": 0
},
{
"date": "2020-1-23",
"confirmed": 3,
"deaths": 0,
"recovered": 0
},
...
Data is cumulative, and is updated thrice daily from the "official" JHU tallies here.