arbitrumfoundation / docs Goto Github PK

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

Is multi-sig wallet like Gnosis Safe officially not eligible for airdrop? I've already connected my multi-sign wallet, It doesn't seem eligible on the Foundation site. And there are many people in the same situation as me in Arbitrum Discord.

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

my address 0x06Ef623E6C10e397A0F2dFfa8c982125328e398c started using arbitrum 397 days ago with 78 transactions and interacted with multiple smart contracts but showing not eligible on checker, and i checked hop blacklist the address is not on there. please help!

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/concepts/sybil-account

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)Can you also check my wallet, I could not win even though I made transactions 0x280E42Fc88EFBd4B150B3137359DD7BAC7b38F96

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: Hello thank you for this Airdrop but I think there is an error because indeed I made more than 250k of transaction, I am a regular user since 2022, you can activate with my address, it seems to me that all my transactions n weren't counted because friends did much less than me but got more, see this screen

My adress : 0x8c0DA62b2F992eC731cE92Fc30B1B5227D8C14a7

Thank you for understanding 🙏 💙

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: I have problem with my account a don't have airdrop. I have 1 account, but don't have drop. And I have question, why yo don't make KYC, if you wanted to weed out bots. Thanks

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/why-governance

Request: (how can we help?)

E.g., #security-coucil is both the quicklook id of a glossary entry and the header tag for a section in the why governance page (link); if you create a <a data-quicklook-from='security-council'>Security Council</a> tag on that page, the poptip picks up the wrong content.

Maybe all quicklook entries should be prefaced with "QLID-" or something?

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

Context:

• The gov glossary is automatically published using a github action that pulls terms/definitions from our Glossary CMS
• Here's the filtered view on that database that shows the terms that we're pulling via typescript (ty again @hkalodner).
• If you visit A Gentle Introduction in the staged site and hover over Arbitrum Rollup (first word), you should see a popover definition appear.
• This is facilitated by the Quicklooks MDX component.
• Source for the Gentle Intro doc is here which demonstrates usage.
• The glossary is basically injected into the page and hidden with CSS, allowing the MDX component to pull definitions based on key mapping.

The issue:

For some reason, the quicklooks component works on initial load, but not on pages that I click into after the initial load. Steps to repro:

1. open gentle intro in a new tab (password = onestepproof)
2. hover over Arbitrum rollup
3. see quicklook definition
4. nav to State of Decentralization from the sidebar within the same tab
5. hover over Progressive decentralization
6. Expected -> quicklook definition. Actual -> nada.

I thought that by moving the <Quicklooks /> invocation into the individual docs pages, we'd trigger the renderQuicklooks function whenever the page loads, but that appears to not be the case. I also noticed that if you add a console.log statement to the Quicklooks = () => body, it's triggered twice on initial page load. This might be related to whatever mechanism explains our issue.

Relevant docs:

• MDX Docusaurus docs -> https://docusaurus.io/docs/markdown-features/react

As is, external links fees like broken pop ups. Maybe make them a different color? idk

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

Hey guys, just finished perusing the reward distribution, and (transactions as far back as July 2022 [though not the requisite 3 minimum to qualify for point doubling]). And according to the screener I've got 9 total points (though 2 from arbitrum nova so I supposed 7+ would be closer to the mark. That said, it only shows 1850 for coins expected, while your literature has it closer to the 7k mark.

I know you guys are stupid busy, so not expecting an answer soon, but I'd appreciate one when you can.

Thanks

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/new-arb-chains

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/new-arb-chains

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

In discord support said:
If a wallet had less than .005 ETH at the moment of the snapshot, one point is subtracted

but in docs we have one more condition:
If an airdrop recipient's wallet balance is less than .005 ETH, and if the wallet hasn't interacted with more than one smart contract, one point is subtracted.

If support was right we should remove second criteria from documentation.

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/new-arb-chains

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: I heard some strange news. When I went to Korea, I participated in this project recommended by my friend and recently I was quite interested in it. But the problem was that my friend was hacked and sent money to my account while staying at home, and I got a call that it was a problem. Maybe that's why you didn't get your assignment?

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/gentle-intro-dao-governance

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)I have several tasks and I was not eligible for the airdrop, why?

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

How do I know if I am eligible for Airdrop please

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

I have more than 100 trx in arbitrum since 15 months ago and I dont think that I have similar sybil attacker treat

Im sure that I shoud have at least 10 point s

I dont know why it says that Im not eligable!!!

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

I have 13 points. transactions are not within 24 hours. I have more than 0.005 eth assets. Don't I need to buy 10200 tokens?
wallet address: 0x22E898e8dc12999494Fcf4CafeA071216c8f8b36
Is your rating wrong?

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: Something wrong with airdrop amount calculation on https://arbitrum.foundation/ website - differs from doc

see example attached - according doc and checklist to the right i've got 12 points - but calculator shows 5250 points instead of 12000 (as described in doc)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/concepts/sybil-account

Request: (how can we help?)

Hi, I checked docs and I should be eligible by at least 8points but site says Im not eligible

by the way I checked my wallet is not in the hop blacklist

I think there is an issue with the site or wallet chekers

my wallet address is 0xfD5BC91F691EC6AAfa609816F8da189C8BD18a00

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

I have made nearly 100 transactions in the past 600 days. However, I have not met the eligibility criteria. After verifying my wallet, I found that it is not enlisted in the Hop protocol or included in the Nansen blacklist.

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/new-arb-chains

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

0x3De1c24cCA9a989D128CB7e258199d3394dd65f8

I made the arbitrum nova bridge, made 2 deposits in the arbitrum network, and made 4 transfers 135 days ago. As for this month and February, I made hundreds of transactions.

And I didn't get anything from the airdrop

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/concepts/sybil-account

Request: (how can we help?)

I have been using Arbitrum since day one. On the 2nd of February my wallet was compromised and liquidated. I don't believe I should be further penalized for not being eligible for ARB airdrop. I lost well over 100K USD on Arbitrum. I think the best course of action would have been to create a forum where users' requests can be investigated on a case-by-case basis. I can prove that did happen because I have a filed police report number.

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: There are a lot of transactions, but it's strange that I was eliminated. One thing that bothers me is that it takes some time for my wallet registration to overlap when I recommend it to my friend on my room computer. I wonder if I wasn't eligible because of this.

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/concepts/public-preview-content

Request: (how can we help?)

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: (how can we help?)
Can my account be checked? It was compromised so I don't hold the 0.005 ETH on there but wondering why it is not eligible
I have done over 120+ transactions.

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request: I think you don't consider early adopters, when fuel costs are expensive, at least you consider transactions before 2022, because after 2022 many airdrop hunters are competing to get airdrops, I don't blame your rules but you should pay attention to early adopters,
Thank You

Source: https://docs.arbitrum.foundation/airdrop-eligibility-distribution

Request:

Dear Arbitrum Foundation,

I am reaching out on behalf of the rhino.fi DeFi project. rhino.fi launched both a cross-chain bridge and cross-chain swap to Arbitrum in 2022, with over 7000 unique bridge transactions made to-date.

We would like to check to make sure that users that have interacted with the rhino.fi smart contracts on Arbitrum One are counted correctly towards the ARB airdrop, and that the methodology does not incorrectly identify any address that has interacted with the rhino smart contracts as a sybil address.

If possible, can you please enable addresses that have interacted with the following two contracts can be eligible for the ARB criteria ‘Bridging to Arbitrum’ and make sure they are not accidentally counted towards sybil/farming (due to transactions originating from the same address)?

Rhino.fi bridge contract address:
https://arbiscan.io/address/0x10417734001162ea139e8b044dfe28dbb8b28ad0

Rhino.fi cross-chain swap contract:
https://arbiscan.io/address/0xca8e436347a46502e353cc36b58fe3bb9214d7fd

We would very much appreciate any assistance that you can give, including clarification as to whether addresses interacting with these addresses may have been blacklisted, since several of our long-term users already alerted us that they do not appear to be eligible.

Kind Regards,

Will
Co-founder rhino.fi