amiaopensource / audioqc Goto Github PK

It would be helpful to be able to view coding history in spreadsheet!

Currently MD5 checks do not report results on success, and lack of output is what means MD5s were successfully validated. Although not strictly necessary it seems more user friendly (and more reassuring) to have something reflect MD5 checks succeeding rather than the current approach of only reporting failures (or other issues).

I tried to install it in Linux Ubunto by this command " brew install audioqc " it download but when I want to run it it gave msg said " ruby " no such file

The parsing for MD5 verification needs to be updated - currently it will check the first line output by bwfmetaedit for a verification success, but on read only files the md5 verification results end up on the second line.

Currently confirmation of BEXT chunk is dependent on the embedded WAV mediaconch policy - a fail condition for lack of BEXT should be added to modes like -b in case -m is not being used.

Hi Andrew,

Playing around with audioqc I've been encountering some errors I'd love to perspective on. When I run audioqc with the -d flag, it combs through all the files and gives a nice CSV report, but when running the script with no flag, or with the -a flag, it seems to quit after FFmpeg processes the first file. Consistently, I've been seeing the following:

./audioqc:216:in `find_peaks_n_phase': undefined method `sum' for #<Array:0x00007fcbdc8929c0> (NoMethodError)
	from ./audioqc:283:in `block in <main>'
	from ./audioqc:266:in `each'
	from ./audioqc:266:in `<main>'

Thanks!!

Ben

hi andrew,

I'm probably revealing my general audio ignorance here, but I was wondering if you'd given any thought to incorporating FFmpeg's loudnorm filter into audioqc. It's hard for me to really tell if it offers audio-related info that astats doesn't already provide, but I think we would be interested in the possibility of an audioqc option that would process files thru loudnorm to give us da LUFS. Have you thought about this at all, and would it be obviously redundant in some way?

thanks!

ben

New features and usage etc need to be added