agiliq / building-multi-tenant-applications-with-django Goto Github PK

I did everything that was written inside the tutorial and now I got this error:

  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1014, in _gcd_import
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 991, in _find_and_load
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 961, in _find_and_load_unlocked
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 219, in _call_with_frames_removed
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1014, in _gcd_import
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 991, in _find_and_load
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 973, in _find_and_load_unlocked
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'tenants'

Hi, this is the most complete document about multitenancy on Django I've have seen.

I like the idea of keeping each tenant in a separated schema, specially for performance, but I don't like subdomains specially for three reasons: additional friction during the registration process, extra SLL costs and exposition of my customer list.

Is there a way to have shared database with isolated schema without subdomains?

Keep up the good work!

Potter migration should depend on potter db not thor db.

When running migrate_schemas all schemas are migrated from Models, however, this way I can not make a table "Master". How to solve it?

Looking at the docker-compose file I noticed that potter_migration depends on thor_db.
I'm assuming this is not intentional and it should rather depend on the potter_db?

  potter_db:
    image: postgres
    environment:
      - POSTGRES_PASSWORD=potter
      - POSTGRES_USER=potter
      - POSTGRES_DB=potter
  potter_web:
    image: agiliq/multi-tenant-demo
    command: python3 manage.py runserver 0.0.0.0:8000
    volumes:
      - .:/code
    depends_on:
      - potter_db
    environment:
      - DATABASE_URL=postgres://potter:potter@potter_db/potter

  potter_migration:
    image: agiliq/multi-tenant-demo
    command: python3 manage.py migrate
    volumes:
      - .:/code
    depends_on:
      - thor_db <---- should be potter_db?
    environment:
      - DATABASE_URL=postgres://potter:potter@potter_db/potter

Here:
https://books.agiliq.com/projects/django-multi-tenant/en/latest/shared-database-shared-schema.html#shared-database-with-shared-schema

restrict user data access by tenant_from_request

or create other model with

tenant
user

To restrict user/tenant access to admin

When I run:

python tenant_context_manage.py <my_schema> loaddata <my_fixture>.json

I recept this message:

"Installed 0 object(s) (of 4) from 1 fixture(s)"

The object is find but not migrate to database.

There is a typo error in the Tenant isolation code is intermixed with app code , as litter should be filter .

this module is already installed but when i execute docker-compose up, this command shows error. can anyone tell what's the problem and how to fix it. Thanks

When using shared-schema, using of Managers will be helpful. Should we include/mention about it in the docs ? See the link here https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.1/topics/db/managers/. Also, note that, this feature was included in Django 1.8 onwards (May be introduced before that, I remember using it around Django==1.6 or Django==1.8)

The docker compose file has hardcoded containers. How do we add new user containers? Do we just change the docker-compose file through python?

typo in get_tenants_map function in utils.py line 16

def get_tenants_map():
    return {"thor.polls.local": "thor", "potter.polls.local": "potter"}

Wanted to raise a PR but cannot push a hotfix branch. Return me a 403.

I have a project configured in this way. Is there any possibility to have a centralized admin panel instead of visiting each domain separately?

• thor.polls.local:8000/admin/
• potter.polls.local:8000/admnin/

Hi,

I am trying to build a multi tenant application by using shared database with isolated schema. I have seen on you read-doc that you have used a function get_tenants_map to keep track of your schema. I would like to know if you have a dynamic solution. Like how should I proceed if I would the user to be able to create his own tenant. What things have to change ?

Thank you very much again for your time guyz!!!