Git Product home page Git Product logo

Comments (7)

selmf avatar selmf commented on May 22, 2024 4

Small update: We're currently re-evaluating this since we are about to take the leap towards Qt6 and this is not widely available on Linux yet. I'm still not a fan of universal packages, but it is a good way to not leave the users behind in this case.

from yacreader.

selmf avatar selmf commented on May 22, 2024 2

A Flatpak is now available from Flathub.

from yacreader.

selmf avatar selmf commented on May 22, 2024 1

I'm personally not a fan of these bundled "packages" (too much bloat for my taste), but the openSuse Build Service I use to build the YACReader packages does support AppImage targets, so I might look into it. It's not a priority though, so if anyone likes to give this a go - knock yourselves out ;)

from yacreader.

kah0922 avatar kah0922 commented on May 22, 2024 1

I would also like to add that a flatpak (probably the most ideal target at this point) should theoretically allow you to use the 7zip backend on Linux, as you can guarantee that the proper version of the library will be used.

from yacreader.

Ashutosh-Kukreti avatar Ashutosh-Kukreti commented on May 22, 2024

I think creating snap packages will be a nice idea since now they are available by default in the ubuntu software center,Although I like flatpak more because they are more secure.

from yacreader.

djkazaz avatar djkazaz commented on May 22, 2024

I would definitely support it, especially flatpak, though appimages are ok too.

Snaps do have a lot of bloat which hurts performance, something to avoid in an application like yacreader.

I've also had a lot of trouble getting it to work from the AUR and given the amount of fragmentation in Linux at the moment, I think universal packages are definitely the future.

from yacreader.

djkazaz avatar djkazaz commented on May 22, 2024

I'm glad to hear it, because as I posted on the forum, I've tried everything to get yacreader to run on manjaro and failed.

As for the question universal packages, I am not sure why people don't like them. Given the number of distributions currently floating around and the low cost of disk space, they make a lot of sense. Not everyone is on Ubuntu/debian, the fedora builds are out of date (they only go up to v31) and the AUR is obviously not the most reliable way to distribute an app.

A universal package solves this once and for all. Anyway, I will look forward to it. Thanks!

from yacreader.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.