`super()` call should not be required if there is no constructor about wing HOT 3 OPEN

just clarifying that the desired behavior is just to use the parent ctor if none is provided (and there are no new fields that need to be initialized).

from wing.

I think TypeScript does something similar. 👍 For anyone implementing the feature, something like this should work:

class Foo extends cloud.Function {}

but this should still emit an error (because the new field needs to be initialized):

class Foo extends cloud.Function {
  bar: str;
  // error: missing constructor ("bar" needs to be initialized)
}

(side note: if Wing had abstract classes there might be more edge cases, but I guess we aren't dealing with that quite yet :-))

from wing.

I think TypeScript does something similar.

It does, but I also verified that there are OO languages that don't, Java for example. I'm still for this feature.

from wing.