feature: Let error handlers handle multiple errors at once about windmill HOT 3 OPEN

What exactly would this toggle do, it would call the error handler itself, so it would, in fact call the error handler with multiple failures/branch error results?

It would indeed call the error handler with the entire result, including the failed branch

from windmill.

@wasnertobias wouldn't you be served better by using "Skip failures" and a branchone ?

I think error handler is a bit of a misnomer, we should call it the "fallback error handler". The better error handlers should be set exactly at the position they are required using skip failures + branchone.

However, I think there is indeed an argument for parallel forloop + branchall to have a toggle to that make them call the error handler themselves too instead of returning straight the failure. Will add to todo-list.

from windmill.

parallel => Preferred for performance reason

Skip failure => Not really what we would like to do: Basically, we would have to check after each branchall manually if any error happened and then early return, because we do not want to continue the flow on failure. (So we basically do not want to skip on failure.)

What exactly would this toggle do, it would call the error handler itself, so it would, in fact call the error handler with multiple failures/branch error results?

from windmill.