Particle filter about mobilerobotics HOT 7 CLOSED

Signing myself up for this one.

from mobilerobotics.

I have a question, so in the old code there are quite a few examples, some of which I'm not sure whether I should refactor them?:

• ellipse.m
• importance.m
• nonlinear.m
• nonlinearmapping.m
• normal.m
• reesampling.m

Or should I just refactor exactly two examples, flyover example and the feature localization example.

from mobilerobotics.

Woah, not sure what all those are, do they all work? You're welcome
to only focus on the EKF/UKFSlam example, the others may be junk
files or different examples.

Steve

On 2/29/2016 2:40 PM, Christopher Choi
  wrote:



  I have a question, so in the old code there are quite a few
    examples, some of which I'm not sure whether I should refactor
    them?:

    ellipse.m
    importance.m
    nonlinear.m
    nonlinearmapping.m
    normal.m
    reesampling.m

  Or should I just refactor exactly two examples, flyover example
    and the feature localization example.
  —
    Reply to this email directly or view
      it on GitHub.

from mobilerobotics.

Haha, too late I already refactored them. The files are not as pointless as we first thought, they are actually the code that produces some of the plots in Estimation I and II slides. e.g. resampling.m corresponds to the particle deprivation problem, nonlinear.m plots the linear and nonlinear transform, how a nonlinear transform does not preserve a gaussian distribution, relevant slides 99 to 101 (kind of..) in Estimation I.

from mobilerobotics.

Also do you mind if I just do the Particle Localization of the old ME597-6-ParticleLocalization code? I feel if I do the EKF/UKFSlam it goes beyond this issue's scope.

from mobilerobotics.

Sounds good.

from mobilerobotics.

Done, please see PR #32

from mobilerobotics.