Git Product home page Git Product logo

Comments (3)

jkbits1 avatar jkbits1 commented on September 13, 2024 1

@stephenscapelliti thanks for these good questions. I'm slightly thinking aloud with this response, so do feel free to challenge anything.

The general thinking behind the original system was that driver/rider would have enough info to contact each other with provided contact details so the situation was for them to resolve outside the system. The system does provide Cancel options on the self-service page for both driver and rider which notify the other person.

The operator/help-line facility existed as back-up to the above, although in practice they were very busy, which suggests not every driver/rider pairing was able to use the above system.

I'm not the originator behind the the revised operator approach, so my views on this that follow are my interpretation (although I think much of the design thoughts are more at the general guideline stage anyway). Given that, the idea seems to be to centralise organisation around the operator, with the operator provided with more system tools to do this.

One benefit of this is to avoid the system having to manage various logins and co-ordination. Although in some ways the new login system could be extended, it is extra complexity that's beyond the midterms. Perhaps something to consider for a later version, though.

One key point at the end of this is how the operator page should display information about cancellations. To some degree, that info exists for drivers with the status field, although currently time info is not shown (that should be added shortly). Similar info should be shown for riders. However, is this sufficient for the operator? I'm not an operator, so I don't know. It wouldn't be so hard to show cancellations for the last hour/day on the operator page, but any contribution means something else isn't done.

from voteamerica.github.io.

stephenscapelliti avatar stephenscapelliti commented on September 13, 2024

Thanks so much for that history, @jkbits1. These were general thoughts about functionality, and it sounds as though they might be beyond the original scope, certainly with regard to the 2020 midterms. Perhaps notification would be something to consider later on. It might help to have input from operators, to determine from their experiences whether this is even worth considering.

from voteamerica.github.io.

jkbits1 avatar jkbits1 commented on September 13, 2024

A similar (not quite duplicate) discussion is in issue #355

from voteamerica.github.io.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.