AutoForm does not correctly validate fields with initial value about uniforms HOT 9 CLOSED

Actually, it's not implemented right now to do so - initial values are taken from your schema. It seems reasonable, to cover your case - given value (if it's present on the first render) should be treated as initial. I'll do it later today.

from uniforms.

Also, you've mentioned hidden fields... It would be great, to add dedicated component to achieve it. I'm curious, how you deal with those. Would you like to create another issue for that?

from uniforms.

I did this:

const Hidden = props =>
    <input type="hidden" name={props.name} value={props.value} onChange={event => props.onChange(event.target.value)}/>;

const HiddenField = connectField(Hidden, {
    baseField: BaseField,
    initialValue: true
});

from uniforms.

Okay. How about a really hidden field? By really I mean invisible - type="hidden". Also with an option to switch to noDOM mode. Would you like to create another issue? I can also do it by myself.

from uniforms.

Done: #53.

I'm new to React from Meteor. When you implement initial values, will it matter if the initial value comes from a reactive collection? Ex:

<HiddenField name="graphics_id" value={this.context.graphic._id? this.context.graphic._id : ''}/>

this.context.graphic._id will be an empty string when the page first loads.

from uniforms.

Yes, it will matter - initial values are calling onChange only after their first render.

from uniforms.

So will onChange detect the updated initial value?

from uniforms.

No. If it will change, it won't be initial value at that time. You have to either wait with render or (what you probably want), use upcoming HiddenField, that will automatically call onChange, when its value will change.

from uniforms.

changing the "visibility" of a field or its container using css causes some
browsers to completely ignore that field!

that's why there is a type=hidden in the html spec.

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Radosław Miernik <[email protected]

wrote:

Closed #52 #52 via 955f18d
955f18d
.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#52 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AEbz3O7oa2q_1R-uoARoC1qwyL4t0uirks5qQXx8gaJpZM4JAaAq
.

from uniforms.