Git Product home page Git Product logo

Comments (11)

valeriansaliou avatar valeriansaliou commented on May 20, 2024 3

Hey Erwan, thank you for the heads up! Given the interest into this feature, I'll be looking into it today/tomorrow :)

from vigil.

blissend avatar blissend commented on May 20, 2024 1

Understood. That would do it for me at least.

Would it make sense to allow each replica to have an optional label? So if I called replica 2 BlueWhale only those who know internally would understand.

from vigil.

valeriansaliou avatar valeriansaliou commented on May 20, 2024

Hello there,

I'm currently not showing the replica name on the public Web page, as it could reveal which internal IP address or URL is being probed. I could add an option to toggle this on or off, with a default value set to "don't show replica name".

Would that do?

from vigil.

valeriansaliou avatar valeriansaliou commented on May 20, 2024

That would make sense as well, let's go for that. On it.

from vigil.

richnusgeeks avatar richnusgeeks commented on May 20, 2024

+1 as looking for the clue which underlying server/alias/label (in order of preference) is failing the test. FYI I'm using the status page for within company only runtime acceptance testing endpoint baked into those VMs (ranging from few to hundreds grouped into their respective categories through probe.service sections).

from vigil.

verymilan avatar verymilan commented on May 20, 2024

I am confused... this milestone is done for a while now, doc seems not to mention that and commits around that time are not very descriptive..

from vigil.

valeriansaliou avatar valeriansaliou commented on May 20, 2024

This is not yet implemented.

from vigil.

verymilan avatar verymilan commented on May 20, 2024

Thanks for letting me know :)

from vigil.

gbonnefille avatar gbonnefille commented on May 20, 2024

What about setting the label in the URL, using the fragment part of the URL like http://...#my_label?
It could be use also for other URI, like ICMP or other.

As far as I know, the fragment part is not processed by server, but only by client. So, using it as a storage for label will never handicap some user to refer an existing service.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986#section-3.5

from vigil.

erwandf avatar erwandf commented on May 20, 2024

Hi Valerian,
is there any update on this issue ? this would also be really useful for us.

Best regards,

from vigil.

erwandf avatar erwandf commented on May 20, 2024

Thanks, this is very nice of you !

from vigil.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.