Dynamically get certificates from ingresses' TLS secrets about yggdrasil HOT 2 CLOSED

I don't think supporting both would be needed for a first pass, neither of us need that option so I would be keen not to over-engineer the solution yet leave it open enough to do that later if need be.

How do you propose managing the secrets? You could go and fetch the secret on every sync but that could be quite inefficient at scale, you could end up making a lot of api calls, alternatively a store could be used but by default that would have all secrets in your cluster being store in yggdrasil, which doesn't seem ideal as you're only interested in the tls related ones.

Also worth noting that by adding this it does make Yggdrasil more of a target for intruders as it will have access to all the secrets in all your clusters.

from yggdrasil.

Hello, sorry for the late reply to this issue.
We have been testing some implementation for this (see master...Aluxima:secrets-sync) and were able to selectively fetch the tls secrets using a store and dynamically use them as downstream certificates.

The synchronization flow was copied from the ingresses sync and definitely needs cleaning and improvement.
I saw this comment about adding events handlers, maybe what we could do is switch to using a shared informer that will be used to watch both ingresses and secrets using proper events, a bit like haproxy ingress-controller does (see https://github.com/haproxytech/kubernetes-ingress/blob/master/pkg/k8s/main.go#L148 and https://github.com/haproxytech/kubernetes-ingress/blob/master/pkg/controller/monitor.go#L27)

Also I noticed some complexity issues in the way that the snapshots are done. Right now yggdrasil does a snapshot (here) at each and every resource addition/change/deletion so the startup phase with thousands of ingresses and secrets never ends :D
But I think this deserves its own issue.

About the security concerns of yggdrasil holding access to k8s secrets, it is an accepted risk on our side and the rights will not be needed for those who will not use this option.

Do you think it is a good way to go for this new feature?

from yggdrasil.