Demonstrative case for WRF-SUEWS coupled system about wrf-suews HOT 12 CLOSED

I was finally able to start the runs for 4 runs (each season 1) of 4 domains setup. I reduced the number of processors in some of the runs to have a more stable run. It will take longer to run for some of them, but at least I can run them at the same time.

from wrf-suews.

I am trying to run cases for Swindon and London at the same time. Would the set of domain like this be suitable for this run:

from wrf-suews.

Try to add larger "padding" to d03 and d04 in the x-direction of d02 so it has a similar padding area as in the y-direction; otherwise it looks good to me.

from wrf-suews.

Something that we have not fixed yet and I think it is essential to fix (or justify it) in this stage is the following:

• When changing wrfinputs for each specific area from the suitable parameters, we add SUEWS related parameters to all domains (1,2,3, or 4 in this case). For domains 3 and 4 there is no problem since we can modify them based on the specific city (London or Swindon). However, it is not clear what should we do for domain 1 and 2 and which parameters should be given to each grid in these domains.

• So far, for example for 3 domains run of London/Swindon, the same parameters as domain 3 would be added for domains 1 and 2, and for urban related parameters (e.g. population, building height etc..), the values are scaled based on the urban fraction.

• I know that it might not have lots of impacts on the final results as long as we put correct parameters in the smallest domain, and semi-correct ones in bigger ones, but how can we justify this is the best approach?

from wrf-suews.

@sunt05 Do you know anyone who has used Jasmin for running multiple jobs at the same time? The system has been really unstable for me since yesterday trying to run multiple cases.

from wrf-suews.

Sorry not. But just give them a call or submit a ticket: they usually have quick responses: http://www.jasmin.ac.uk/contact/

from wrf-suews.

Ok thanks. I saw that they are having problems with space and reduced home space to 100 GB, and not accepting new users. So maybe the problem is that. Thanks anyway.

from wrf-suews.

@hamidrezaomidvar Have you modified the structure of namelist.suews in recent days? I meet the same problem as before when I run wrf.exe. I use the version you cloned for me.

ERROR reading sector coeff of namelist.suews

from wrf-suews.

from wrf-suews.

Yes, I feel puzzled. Do I need to update supy to generate namelist.suews?

from wrf-suews.

I tried to use the namelist.suews under WRF-SUEWS/coupling-automator, but still not to solve the issue

from wrf-suews.

from wrf-suews.