[P1] Is it possible to "bake in" ReFT changes to the weights and produce a model without pyreft dependencies? about pyreft HOT 3 CLOSED

Hi @ThaddeusChristopher!

Thanks for raising this point. Unfortunately, it could be hard --- in some sense, just like adaptors are not folded into the weights due to non-linearity and thus increase compute overhead. For instance, if ReFT is applied in the middle of two linear layers, then yes, it could be potentially folded in by coupling the rotation weights with the linear layer weights.

Another reason why it is hard is that, we intervene not on all positions, but just on very limited positions (e.g., the first n tokens and last n tokens in the prompt). And these intervening positions depend on the input. As a result, the interventions have to happen during run-time to target dynamic locations.

Hopefully, these are helpful!

from pyreft.

This is helpful in understanding how it works. From tinkering with it over the last few weeks, it seems unique in how it works, and would probably need to be built from scratch to work on something other than torch/transformers - is that a fair assumption? Was looking into what it would take to do mlx weeks ago, came back to it this weekend, and given pyreft requires pyvene, it sounds like much more than a weekend project.

Fun though - really neat to be able to steer it so easily.

from pyreft.

closing this issue for now, as the MLX support will be tracked in pyvene: stanfordnlp/pyvene#67

from pyreft.