Dreamchecker: Proc reference syntax not recognized as valid about spacemandmm HOT 2 CLOSED

it is required to be able to use the builtin call() proc on DM procs.

How do you figure?

As I understand, DM simply ignores the proc keyword in this position, and it has no effect. For instance, var/mob/proc/foo = new() infers /mob as the type to be new'd.

The most basic correct way to type such variables is to give them no type: var/foo. However because such references do in fact have variables you may benefit from an interface type like this to expose them: https://codedocs.tgstation13.org/procpath.html

from spacemandmm.

Thanks for the prompt response!

Hmm, I'm a bit confused - I distinctly remember some cases where the compiler screamed at me until I added /proc to the path for this usecase in the Urist SS13 codebase, but I couldn't reproduce it in my project.

I'll provisionally close this for now and reopen if I can get a solid example. Sorry for the hassle.

from spacemandmm.