Extension methods configuration about soenneker.utils.autobogus HOT 7 CLOSED

@benjaminsampica Fair points. I'm not opposed to a Bogus wrapper. I'll take a look.

from soenneker.utils.autobogus.

@soenneker huge thanks for thanking this over and fixing some of the bugs (like DateOnly issues).

Cosign on @benjaminsampica - it would be great to allow customization the way AutoBogus classic did

from soenneker.utils.autobogus.

@benjaminsampica @conradakunga OK I've implemented AutoFaker<T>. I have some tests in place, but if you run into any issues with it please let me know. Thanks

from soenneker.utils.autobogus.

Can you expand on your example some? Was this supported in AutoBogus before?

I removed a bunch of extension methods from the autofakerconfigbuilder but I think the majority of it exists within the AutoFakerConfig...

I could definitely be wrong.

Happy to help solve any friction!

from soenneker.utils.autobogus.

Looking to do something like this (from AutoBogus). There was also Ignore(), which would skip a property.

var personFaker = new AutoFaker<Person>()
 .RuleFor(fake => fake.Id, fake => fake.Random.Int())
 .Generate();

If you’re familiar with AutoFixture at all, their convention is With() and Without()

from soenneker.utils.autobogus.

@soenneker I'm trying to use the new implemented AutoFaker<T> with a static value for a property but it is throwing: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

My implementation:

var test = new AutoFaker<Entity>()
    .RuleFor(e => e.TypeA, nameof(EnumTypeA.Lorem))
    .RuleFor(e => e.TypeB, nameof(EnumTypeB.Lorem))
    .Generate(3);

from soenneker.utils.autobogus.

@marcio-af-oliveira can you send me the full exception message with the callstack? I just built several tests just like how you have your code there and have no issues.

from soenneker.utils.autobogus.