Comments (7)
I would prefer if we use the LGPL 2.1 license over LGPL 3.0. A lot of older MUDs are closed source and prefer a more liberal license because of this.
from dikumud.
You can freely choose between LGPL 2.1 and LGPL 3.0 :-) Someday I'll update the doc.
from dikumud.
@Seifert69 FYI, if you want to allow us to freely choose you must select the LGPL 2.1 license for this project.
from dikumud.
Do you know how per chance? :o) I'm a Git noob still and couldn't figure it out.
from dikumud.
@Seifert69 You generally upload the license file at verbatim into the repository. Right now you have this file:
https://github.com/Seifert69/DikuMUD/blob/master/dm-dist-alfa/doc/license.doc
You would want to upload the below LGPL 2.1 license and reference it in your above document.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.txt
from dikumud.
from dikumud.
Might I humbly suggest that the wording is changed so:
As of February 3rd, 2020, the DikuMUD authors Sebastian Hammer, Hans-Henrik
Starfeldt, Katja Nyboe, and Michael Seifert have all agreed to make their
-DikuMUD work available under the LGPL license. We’ve been unable to get a
-hold of Tom Madsen, but we feel fairly confident that he would likewise agree
-to submit his work under LGPL. This means you can choose yourself if you want
-to use DikuMUD under the LGPL or the original license. Please note that
-derivative work isn't automatically under LGPL. It would need to be
-re-released by its respective authors.
+DikuMUD work available under the GNU Lesser General Public license, either
+version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. We’ve
+been unable to get a hold of Tom Madsen, but we feel fairly confident that
+he would likewise agree to submit his work under LGPL. This means you can
+choose yourself if you want to use DikuMUD under the LGPL or the original
+license. Please note that derivative work isn't automatically under LGPL.
+It would need to be re-released by its respective authors.
I would offer the advisory that relicensing like this does really need all the licensors to consent so the fact that you have not been able to track down one of your group (or their estate - yeah I do mean that - in the worse case, given that one is working in the area of Copyright one might have to go down that path) is awkward...!
from dikumud.
Related Issues (1)
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from dikumud.