Why not just wait() for the stop event to happen? about sanic HOT 8 CLOSED

I uh... I have no excuse <<;;

from sanic.

Very strange, when I use wait() it registers the SIGTERM, but doesn't unblock after stop_event.set() is called.

from sanic.

I can give it a try.

from sanic.

This is apparently why wait wasn't working:

Unix: wait(object_list, timeout) almost equivalent select.select(object_list, [], [], timeout). The difference is that, if select.select() is interrupted by a signal, it can raise OSError with an error number of EINTR, whereas wait() will not.

From here: https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.html

from sanic.

@seemethere this is probably good to close I think.

from sanic.

Would agree, closed per #238

from sanic.

Actually this is still an issue but it's been very elusive.

from sanic.

Is this still an issue? Will reopen if necessary.

from sanic.