Design: trailing comma semantics about ron HOT 6 CLOSED

There were no real complaints yet (since it's not implemented / used), but @vitvakatu found it weird and I think users would find it annoying if the parser fails because of a missing trailing comma (which isn't obvious). Furthermore, I think a trailing comma is useful, but should not be enforced just because of that fact; enforcing it would make it an anti-feature again. The simple and obvious solution would be to allow it everywhere, which would make the spec easier and it's also easier to keep in mind.

from ron.

That's already the case.

from ron.

👍 since I was CCed here on Gitter. This proposal looks good to me.

from ron.

It looked good to me at first, but I already hear people complaining about it.

from ron.

@torkleyy We can't address a vague feeling of dissatisfaction. What were the complaints?

from ron.

That sounds good to me, for our serializer can we have it insert trailing commas for structs though?

from ron.