version style, missing SPARQLWrapper2 class in > 1.6.0 about sparqlwrapper HOT 8 CLOSED

The class is still here:

but export-rules could have changed

semver is how I see it, yes

from sparqlwrapper.

yupp, seems the export-rules changed and by this its API...
https://github.com/RDFLib/sparqlwrapper/blob/d8a30be8af6d789fc72e2312ffd8b526a4d3d894/SPARQLWrapper/__init__.py (see last line)

is it ok to unquote that last line again?

from sparqlwrapper.

here's the commit: 521591d

@wikier do you remember why you commented it out?

from sparqlwrapper.

I was not aware of people using such experimental code... @joernhees I can recover the export-rules, but at some point we should take a look on that old and experimental code, and decide whether it should continue being distributed.

from sparqlwrapper.

@wikier I suggest to do revision before 2.x in light of #12 and #18

from sparqlwrapper.

didn't really know it was experimental ;)

from sparqlwrapper.

Well, maybe not "experimental", but we never evolved it since the first prototypes...

I propose to do the following:

• I restore the export rules to get it back in the next patch release (1.6.3)
• think about a proper name and revisit the code for the next minor release (1.7.0) or even for the next major release (2.0) at some point we should start to discuss at issue #37

from sparqlwrapper.

👍 thanks a lot ;)

from sparqlwrapper.