rails/rails is dependent on yard, rails and sdoc about rails HOT 8 CLOSED

Or just bin/rake. But I agree it's nice not to have to think about it.

from rails.

A good first step would be:

diff --git a/railties/lib/rails/api/task.rb b/railties/lib/rails/api/task.rb
index ddd7952381..da13beea4b 100644
--- a/railties/lib/rails/api/task.rb
+++ b/railties/lib/rails/api/task.rb
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # frozen_string_literal: true
 
 require "rdoc/task"
-require "rails/api/generator"
+require_relative "generator"
 
 module Rails
   module API

from rails.

Is there a reason to not use bundle exec rake?

from rails.

I feel like running rake is the standard way of running tests in a ruby project

from rails.

No. Using rake you are running outside of the bundler environment. Either you need bundle exec or some bundler binstub.

from rails.

If you look on every single Ruby project, you don't see Rakefiles setting up the bundler environment, neither bundler does that when you generate a new gem. Rails apps setup the bundle environment, so I'm not opossed to do this in Rails, but definitely this isn't the standard way of running tests in Ruby projects.

Project might document rake as the way to run tests, but in reality they mean bundle exec rake. They just don't document that.

from rails.

Example https://github.com/thoughtbot/factory_bot/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#running-the-test-suite

from rails.

Ok I'm just gonna alias rake "bundle exec rake". For thoughtbot projects I just run rspec but I have alias rspec "bundle exec rspec" because there could be multiple versions of rspec.

from rails.