Regarding ShiftDotProduct about she HOT 4 CLOSED

Hi,

Thanks very much for your interests on our project. Please check the latest codes. You will get the following result:

Bests,
~Qian

from she.

Hi,

Thanks for the speedy response.
When i tried Be=[ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0] , the decrypted result is not same as plain result:
######## 1. shiftDot(A[0:input_size-1], Be[0:input_size-1]) Verification#######
A=[ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7]
Be=[ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0]
elem_shift time:0.000007
reduce_add time:2.231727
Decrypted Result:24
Plaintext Result: 28

Thanks.

from she.

Hi,
Thanks very much for your feedback. Yes, one solution is that you could use the latest code to avoid this "not exact result", but this is a little slower in running time. I just replaced the reduce_add() into seq_add().

If you still want to use the old codes, you should take care of the vector length, e.g. 10, you can also get the correct answer using reduce_add(). One of my future works is to get the robust and fast reduce_add().

from she.

Hi,
Thanks for the info.
Looking forward to your future works. Cheers :)

from she.