Manylinux2010 does not seem to be correctly supported about maturin HOT 5 CLOSED

It looks like that's just auditwheel being weird. Judging from the code producing the message, it's not an error but just a message to tell that {chosen platform tag} is ok with {lowest possible platform tag}. The list of linked symbols and libs printed below is compatible with manylinux1, so in that context the message makes sense. I've also checked the wheels and the in-wheel metadata definitely says manylinux2010.

from maturin.

I'd say just build manylinux1 wheels; I don't see any reason for building manylinux2010 wheels or for running auditwheel. manylinux2010 isn't even fully rolled out yet.

from maturin.

Please post the commands required to reproduce the message you got.

I am building that wheel using the manylinux2010 docker image so I'm supposed to get a manylinux2010 wheel.

No, the platform tag is controlled solely by the cli options and the python interpreter.

from maturin.

• Clone the fastuuid repository.
• Build the docker image for manylinux2010.
  sudo docker build -f manylinux2010.dockerfile -t fastuuid_manylinux2010:latest
• Run the container using the following command:
  sudo docker run -e MANYLINUX_VERSION="2010" -e TRAVIS_TAG="$TRAVIS_TAG" -e PYPI_USERNAME="$PYPI_USERNAME" -e PYO3_PACK_PASSWORD="$PYO3_PACK_PASSWORD" -v $PWD:/tmp/src fastuuid_manylinux2010:latest

The command that should be executed is:

/opt/python/cp37-cp37m/bin/pyo3-pack build --manylinux 2010 --release -i /opt/python/cp37-cp37m/bin/python -i /opt/python/cp36-cp36m/bin/python -i /opt/python/cp35-cp35m/bin/python

from maturin.

So should I build both or simply auditwheel repair?

from maturin.