Async support for PyMySQL about tornado-mysql HOT 6 CLOSED

Hi, @haizaar . Thanks to contact me. I love your idea.

At first, I want to use asyncio to make PyMySQL async.
But I realized that using asyncio based library from Tornado is not simple.
So I made this project as temporal solution.

For long term solution, I feel asyncio is the best. It's coroutine is faster than Tornados'
thanks to yield from, and it supports Windows IOCP.
But in middle term, PostgreSQL based approach is looks good to me.
It's widely used already.

from tornado-mysql.

Excellent.

I agree that in the end we all will hopefully use just asyncio.

But until it happens we'll need a layered approach.

BTW Tornado plugging in external event loop implementation since v4.0.

OK,
So if in the beginning of October you'll have some psycopg2-style async
code ready in PyMySQL, I then can integrate it into momoko pretty fast.

Cheers,
Zaar
On Sep 9, 2014 8:11 PM, "INADA Naoki" [email protected] wrote:

Hi, @haizaar https://github.com/haizaar . Thanks to contact me. I love
your idea.

At first, I want to use asyncio to make PyMySQL async.
But I realized that using asyncio based library from Tornado is not simple.
So I made this project as temporal solution.

For long term solution, I feel asyncio is the best. It's coroutine is
faster than Tornados'
thanks to yield from, and it supports Windows IOCP.
But in middle term, PostgreSQL based approach is looks good to me.
It's widely used already.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1 (comment).

from tornado-mysql.

Hi Naoki,

I'm back in track.

Do you have any async-poll code ready for integration with momoko?

Best,
Zaar

from tornado-mysql.

Awwww.. sad thread. Did this get any traction?

from tornado-mysql.

No unfortunately.
On Oct 7, 2015 00:47, "Shane R. Spencer" [email protected] wrote:

Awwww.. sad thread. Did this get any traction?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1 (comment)
.

from tornado-mysql.

Sorry. Current my thought is here

from tornado-mysql.