COMMON block variables are not initialized in pArpack about arpack-ng HOT 31 OPEN

OK, I'll let that unfinished (took me months to get parpack to work - the key was to pass MPI_Comm)... Who knows, I'll maybe have the one magic idea that makes everything work tomorrow... Or not ! :D

from arpack-ng.

You have msglvl .gt. 0 somewhere.

from arpack-ng.

what is msglvl ?

from arpack-ng.

In debug.h there are several integers which can be used to get information from the subroutines. For instance, if msaupd is 1 in your main program, then pdsaupd.f will set msglvl to msaupd and print some information. The output is redirected to unit logfil, which should be set to 6 (stdout).

from arpack-ng.

@caliarim sorry, I am lost here as I don't really work with Fortran much. I am using C-wrappers to pArpack functions from a C++ application. There is indeed debug.h in the SRC file, but my pArpack installation has no headers. It's probably missing in cmake's scripts.

Also I do not set msaupd to anything as I was simply not aware of it. I would expect that the default is no debug output? You probably refer to these http://www.caam.rice.edu/software/ARPACK/UG/node133.html and https://github.com/opencollab/arpack-ng/blob/master/DOCUMENTS/debug.doc ?

p.s. It would be good if one could disable all output at configure time with cmake.

p.p.s. the msglvl in those pArpack routines is indeed set in pdsaupd to be msaupd and pdseupd to mseupd.

from arpack-ng.

@caliarim

if msaupd is 1 in your main program, then pdsaupd.f will set msglvl to msaupd and print some information

could you please help clarify this given my previous reply? Especially how is it possible that this output happens if I call parpack wrappers from C++ and I certainly don't set msaupd?

I tried to check default values of those variables within (p)Arpack sources, but did not find anything but a few examples/tests where msaupd is set. I am not a Fortran user, but I guess the default is zero, so technically I should not see any output.

from arpack-ng.

I never used pArpack. But I would try the following: for each variable in debug.h, starting from mgetv0, I would set it explicitely to 0 in your main file.

from arpack-ng.

@fghoussen since you added C/C++ bindings, maybe you know how to set those common block variables of (p)Arpack from C/C++? I tried

extern "C" {
  extern struct
  {
    int  logfil;
    int  ndigit;
    int  mgetv0;
    int  msaupd;
    int  msaup2;
    int  msaitr;
    int  mseigt;
    int  msapps;
    int  msgets;
    int  mseupd;
    int  mnaupd;
    int  mnaup2;
    int  mnaitr;
    int  mneigh;
    int  mnapps;
    int  mngets;
    int  mneupd;
    int  mcaupd;
    int  mcaup2;
    int  mcaitr;
    int  mceigh;
    int  mcapps;
    int  mcgets;
    int  mceupd;
  } debug_;
}

int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
  debug_.logfil = 6;
  debug_.msaupd = 1;
  debug_.mseupd = 0;
  debug_.ndigit = -3;
  <blabla>
}

but I get EXC_BAD_ACCESS on setting those. What's even more frightening is

(lldb) p &debug_.logfil
error: Multiple external symbols found for 'debug_'
id = {0x0000038a}, range = [0x000000011a72fc00-0x000000011a72fc60), name="debug_"id = {0x00000449}, range = [0x000000011a78aba0-0x000000011a78ac00), name="debug_"

Since I link against both Arpack and pArpack, it could be that the two are confused. Indeed

$ nm -g <path-to>/arpack-ng-3.5.0-7b5boj3c7gsexjreipjcapj7525qgzfa/lib/libarpack.2.dylib | grep debug_
000000000004cba0 S _debug_

and

$ nm -g <path-to>/arpack-ng-3.5.0-7b5boj3c7gsexjreipjcapj7525qgzfa/lib/libparpack.2.dylib | grep debug_
000000000004bc00 S _debug_

So it looks like if the user library/executable links against both, there is no way to do anything about those COMMON variables.

from arpack-ng.

I close as I worked around the problem by patching.

from arpack-ng.

There is indeed debug.h in the SRC file, but my pArpack installation has no headers. It's probably missing in cmake's scripts.

Yes, I would say debug.h is missing, and, that it should be added by make install (both with cmake and autotools). @sylvestre what do you think ?

@fghoussen since you added C/C++ bindings, maybe you know how to set those common block variables of (p)Arpack from C/C++?

iso_c_binding is a gateway from Fortran to C only (not C++). debug.h is already C: binding is not a problem here. I would say:

1. debug.h is missing in the install directory
2. your EXC_BAD_ACCESS seems "logical" to me !... Indeed, as you need to use what's in debug.h, at C side, I guess you need to specify static keyword and initialize all static variables (debug_) out of the scope of the main: seems it is not what you do in your code snippet. I would say the error Multiple external symbols comes from the fact that the compiler/linker is mislead and believes debug_ is a symbol defined both in and out of the main.

I would say that if you succeed to get 1) and 2) your patch/trick (with sed) will no more be necessary.

from arpack-ng.

Thanks @fghoussen for the detailed reply. Since I am under pressure to get some results, for now I will stick with patching and maybe get back to this issue later.

from arpack-ng.

Sure.
I didn't tested that (you'll probably need to "play" with extern and static anyway...) : my first try would be to add " static debug_ dbg_ + initialize dbg_ " after the extern bloc but before main, and, use dbg_ in main... Good luck ! :D

from arpack-ng.

Oh men !... Just realized debug.h is fortran, not C (I was mislead by the file name). My suggestion will probably not work (at least not so "easily"...). I have on-going stuffs to run here in priority. I'll try to push a PR about that in coming days (if I can get it to work... which is not sure at all - icb is needed as debug.h is frotran)

from arpack-ng.

I had a closer look at that. Seems not trivial at all !...
For now, I have no solution. I'll PR one if I get something to work.

from arpack-ng.

For now, the best I have is "nothing" (if passing common with icb), or, "segmentation fault" (if not passing common with icb) !... :D
@davydden : not sure to succeed to finish this (icb is already cumbersome, the /debug/ common block makes it even more terrible !)... But I can push that (?) if you want to restart from here. Let me know :D

from arpack-ng.

@fghoussen I think you invested already enough time into trying to solve this issue, thank you 👍

But I can push that (?) if you want to restart from here. Let me know :D

I have close to no experience with Fortran, so let's just leave it as-is for now.

from arpack-ng.

@davydden I guess I got it !... You may want to test it :D
@sylvestre I'am about to PR a fix for this issue

from arpack-ng.

as of d7deefd the issue is still there.

based on https://www.obliquity.com/computer/fortran/common.html

the name of the BLOCK DATA subprogram unit should be included in an EXTERNAL statement in some or all of the procedures which contain the named COMMON blocks initialised by the BLOCK DATA subprogram.

will try adding EXTERNAL debug_init ...

from arpack-ng.

@fghoussen @sylvestre @caliarim here is an interesting thing I found while debugging this issue. Inside PARPACK/SRC/MPI/pdgetv0.f I see

(gdb) f 1
#1  0x00007fffd7af4289 in pdgetv0 (comm=0, ido=2, bmat='G', itry=1, initv=.TRUE., n=1089, j=1, v=..., ldv=1089, resid=..., rnorm=0.2379588772948126, ipntr=..., workd=..., workl=..., ierr=0, _bmat=1) at <arpack>/PARPACK/SRC/MPI/pdgetv0.f:428
428	     &        '_getv0: B-norm of initial / restarted starting vector')
(gdb) p mgetv0
$1 = 0
(gdb) p msglvl
$2 = 251672707

So msglvl is rubbish, at least that's what gdb tells me. And then it tries to print at PARPACK/SRC/MPI/pdgetv0.f:428.
There is assignment

msglvl = mgetv0

but this is inside if (ido .eq. 0).

p.s. As I mentioned before, changing msglvl = 0 solves the issue, but since I don't have much experience Fortran I really don't know what's going on and how two integer variables may have different values after assignment.

Note that it's not the if which is at fault, right after msglvl = mgetv0 is executed I have

(gdb) p msglvl
$4 = 251672707

this happens with gfortran 4.8.5.

from arpack-ng.

@davydden: did you try adding a dummy program ? Seems external in program forces to load and initialize the common blocks (via block data). Arpack is a library (probably no program, just subroutines) : so either you add external in ALL subroutines (no way !), or, you add a dummy program (that nobody will never use) and hope this will be enough to initialize the debug commonblock: not sure if this could work...

 >> git diff
diff --git a/debug_init.f90 b/debug_init.f90
index f4c4f8e..74ae137 100644
--- a/debug_init.f90
+++ b/debug_init.f90
@@ -10,3 +10,7 @@ block data debug_init
        mcaupd, mcaup2, mcaitr, mceigh, mcapps, mcgets, mceupd &
        / 6, -3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 /
 end block data debug_init
+
+! This dummy program is not meant to be used: it's meant to initialize the debug common block.
+program dummy
+  include 'debug.h'
+  external debug_init ! Trigger initialization (block data). 
+end program dummy

If this does not work, or, if you believe this "trick" is "bad" (I could understand that ! :D) I guess you need to add external mgetv0 after ALL declarations of integer mgetv0 in ALL subroutines AND you must do that for ALL variables in the debug common block !...

from arpack-ng.

@fghoussen you probably mis-read my post. It’s not the common block variables that have issues. Have a look at the printing from debugger.

from arpack-ng.

mgetv0 belongs to common /debug/and is supposed to initialize msglvl(as far as I understand). That is why I guess initializing the common block could fix the issue (not sure).

from arpack-ng.

But you missed the bizarre

(gdb) p mgetv0
$1 = 0

from arpack-ng.

Yes and no ! :D When debugging fortran, you can not always rely on what gdb says !...

My understanding is that, since fortran 2003, DATA is meant to replace SAVE (DATA = SAVE + initialization). Not 100% sure but seems likely. The only materials I found on the web is in french: go here http://calcul.math.cnrs.fr/Documents/Ecoles/LEM2I/Mod3/fortran.pdf (slide 19) and / or here http://www.idris.fr/media/formations/fortran/idris_fortran_avance_cours.pdf (search for data and save). Also here you find little clue : http://www.fortran.com/fortran/books/t90_82.html (check out 5th things to know).

I guess that ALL variables involved in a save statement should be replaced by a data statement : this is a tedious work to go (git grep "save " tells that there is a lot of save all over the place)...

Example for one save in one file:

~> vi PARPACK/SRC/MPI/pdnaitr.f
! save  first, iseed, inits, iter, msglvl, orth, rnorm0 ! before fortran 2003
data  first, iseed, inits, iter, msglvl, orth, rnorm0 / ...., 0, ..... / ! after fortran 2003 

Sometimes, I'am not even sure to really know how variables should be initialized (iseed for instance?) !?...

@davydden : I guess you need to agree with @sylvestre on what is needed / critical to do ! Seems ideally, all save should be replaced with data : as this is a long and risky/tricky job, you may agree to do that only for msglvl and put that in a "one commit operation" to keep history clean and allow to step back if bug show up... If this turns out to be OK, you may want to do the same for all other variables step by step... Or not ! You decide guys. :D

from arpack-ng.

@fghoussen wow, thanks for reply. The more I know about Fortran, the less I want to ever touch it ;-) I will try a few things tomorrow and report back

from arpack-ng.

@fghoussen here's the update

1. having external debug_init in pdgetv0.f

      include   'debug.h'
      include   'stat.h'
      external debug_init

does not help, i still get to the printing

2. while adding a dummy program in debug_init I noticed that nothing changes because debug_init.f90 is only compiled when ICB is enabled. I enabled it (fixed one bug along the way) but no luck here either. Even with a dummy program I still get into printing. I also re-tried the option (1) after enabling ICB.

Bottom line: I think I tried everything suggested but it's still broken.

from arpack-ng.

Your last chance could be :

>> git diff
diff --git a/PARPACK/SRC/BLACS/pcgetv0.f b/PARPACK/SRC/BLACS/pcgetv0.f
index 4f3f133..4b80ed9 100644
--- a/PARPACK/SRC/BLACS/pcgetv0.f
+++ b/PARPACK/SRC/BLACS/pcgetv0.f
@@ -182,7 +182,8 @@ c
      &           rnorm0
       Complex 
      &           cnorm, cnorm2
-      save       first, iseed, inits, iter, msglvl, orth, rnorm0
+      save       first, iseed, inits, iter, orth, rnorm0
+      data       msglvl / 0 /
 c
 c     %----------------------%
 c     | External Subroutines |

If OK, you should do that in all subroutines which declare and use msglvl.
If KO, I have no solution !...

from arpack-ng.

Your last chance could be

Unfortunately that does not change the behaviour 😞 . But thanks for the suggestion, @fghoussen

from arpack-ng.

What is the compiler you use ? Is it intel (sometimes bugged) ? Did you try with gnu ? May be a compiler bug... Already seen that: if you compile with intel and -02 or -O3, try with no optim -O0 : is the problem still here ?

write out msglvl and mgetv0 after line 241:
msglvl = mgetv0

Did you try:

1. to compile with -std=2003
2. try with both save and data

from arpack-ng.

What is the compiler you use ? Is it intel (sometimes bugged) ? Did you try with gnu ?

gnu 4.8.5.

Did you try:

will do on Monday as I am AFK today.

from arpack-ng.

pdgetv0.f:242 => write out msglvl and mgetv0 (after msglvl = mgetv0 - if mgetv0 is 0 like it seems, msglvl MUST be zero, if not the compiler is to blame...)

I suspect a compiler bug (it happens some times): try with another compiler and / or play with compiler options (-O0 , -O2, ...)

from arpack-ng.