How fantasical would it be for a target list include ? about gobuster HOT 8 CLOSED

IMHO, this doesn't make sense for url mode, but makes a bit more sense for dns mode.

However, given that everything is multithreaded, making the output "nice" would be painful. So would you be open to just having it all come out as a mess that you can grep through or are you expecting me to compartmentalise the output for you?

Bro, Y U NO PR?! 💃

from gobuster.

but what about when I do big list from ASN's and have a big ass list of https://ip:port/$derping_here
:(

#FINE

you can have sausages.

it's all good mate, if it's too much ballache for my niche criteria ... I'll give it a miss ... or pick up some go books hehe

from gobuster.

Let me know if you feel like answering my question :)

from gobuster.

I'd be more happy to get it in any format! 🍰 🍰 🍰

from gobuster.

Optimus - Don't succumb to peer pressure. He says steak, he means McDonald's. I've been burned by this before. But just to stir the pot, maybe mass input parsing would be a nice feature on this - you told me you were a scalertron. Maybe he doesn't know how, @n0x00? lol

from gobuster.

Screw you both and your trolling! :)

Adding this isn't so difficult, but doing it nicely isn't as simple as it looks on the surface. For each word that you process you not only have multiple extensions but you now have multiple targets. Each target has its own set of issues, including whether the target is even online or not. Given that the targets are being processed concurrently along with the words in the dictionary, you start to get into the murky waters of managing errors across threads and cleaning up nicely. There are ways around this, but they're not obvious.

There's just nuances that aren't known until you dive in. So while it sounds simple, I reckon it's more than a 5 minute job.

Maybe he doesn't know how

I know what you're trying to do!

from gobuster.

Hahahahaha! I knew you'd bite!

Just messing with your Optimus - if anyone can bust it out, it's you. Nice suggestion though from John ;-)

Lawrence

On 26 Jan 2016, at 21:27, OJ Reeves [email protected] wrote:

Screw you both and your trolling! :)

Adding this isn't so difficult, but doing it nicely isn't as simple as it looks on the surface. For each word that you process you not only have multiple extensions but you now have multiple targets. Each target has its own set of issues, including whether the target is even online or not. Given that the targets are being processed concurrently along with the words in the dictionary, you start to get into the murky waters of managing errors across threads and cleaning up nicely. There are ways around this, but they're not obvious.

There's just nuances that aren't known until you dive in. So while it sounds simple, I reckon it's more than a 5 minute job.

Maybe he doesn't know how

I know what you're trying to do!

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

from gobuster.

Been thinking about this a lot, and I think that the answer is going to remain "no" for now, I'm sorry. Going to close this. If it becomes a super big issue, then let's talk again. I think the effort vs gains at the moment isn't enough to justify. However, if you feel like submitting a PR, go for it :)

from gobuster.