Request to join the wg about security-wg HOT 7 CLOSED

Seems like the consensus is to move forward. @brycebaril can you submit a PR on the README.md adding you to the WG.

from security-wg.

Sounds good to me, Bryce, can we get a couple more thumbs up? Actually, it looks like we need unanimous consensus: https://github.com/nodejs/security-wg/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md#wg-membership Not sure what that means, probably no objections? :-(

@mhdawson @cjihrig how should this work? do we discuss in private before the next meeting and then invite Bryce? Wait for any objections? What?

from security-wg.

It looks like we should add it to the agenda for the next meeting. Personally, I'd rather just call for objections (private objections can be sent to me) here, and add Bryce next week.

from security-wg.

For many WGs the process is often that people join the meetings, volunteer for work and then get added after some level of activity.

Since the WG is still really in bootstrap mode and we have a longish list of members with varying levels of activity though I have no objection to adding Bryce as we want as many active participants as possible.

I do suggest the WG adopt participation guidelines along the lines of (taken from Community Committee governance):

CC members are expected to regularly participate in CC activities.

In the case where an individual CC member -- within any three month period -- attends fewer than 25% of the regularly scheduled meetings, does not participate in CC discussions, and does not participate in CC votes, the member shall be automatically removed from the CC. The member may be invited to continue attending CC meetings as an observer.

from security-wg.

+1 to @brycebaril, and +1 to adding directly.

from security-wg.

@mhdawson will do!

from security-wg.

Looks like this went through, so I'm gonna close this. Welcome @brycebaril!

from security-wg.