Should Nimbus use the "Async" postfix for public async methods like Send? about nimbus HOT 3 CLOSED

I'm still pretty ambivalent about the whole async suffix. Or, to belabour the point, I'mAsync stillAsync prettyAsync ambivalentAsync aboutAsync theAsync wholeAsync asyncAsync suffixAsync.

Personally I think the hit to readability isn't worth the gain - It's Hungarian notation all over again - but I may or may not be in the minority in that respect.

Anyone else have thoughts?

from nimbus.

Like I said, my thoughts are mehAsync, just something I noticed. ;)

On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 2:01 PM, uglybugger [email protected]:

I'm still pretty ambivalent about the whole async suffix. Or, to belabour
the point, I'mAsync stillAsync prettyAsync ambivalentAsync aboutAsync
theAsync wholeAsync asyncAsync suffixAsync.

Personally I think the hit to readability isn't worth the gain - It's
Hungarian notation all over again - but I may or may not be in the minority
in that respect.

Anyone else have thoughts?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/DamianMac/Nimbus/issues/30#issuecomment-31383036
.

from nimbus.

No other thoughts? I'm happy to close this issue unless someone else pipes up with an opinion :)

from nimbus.