Contributing on a regular basis? about blessed-rs HOT 4 CLOSED

As an example workflow:

https://github.com/areweguiyet/areweguiyet#contributing

Not sure if it would be over-engineering, but they set up their own CLI for that, so it would be easier to add and review things, and also run CI in the end. The CLI might be able to be forked and adapted?

from blessed-rs.

@djc I'd absolutely love to have you review on changes. However, I'm somewhat reluctant to gate every change on a review step at this point, simply because the list is so incomplete and it seems to me that keeping friction to making changes and additions low should be prioritised during this initial stage. I'm not usually a "move fast and break things" kind of guy, but it seems appropriate here given that the cost of mistakenly listing a crate is quite low.

Would it be unreasonable to ask you to review the git log post-commit for the time being?

from blessed-rs.

Reviewing the git log post-commit would be annoying because I have to remember to go and look. However, if you just want to do PRs I'm fine if you merge them without waiting for my feedback, and I'll give feedback asynchronously.

from blessed-rs.

That makes sense. I'll try to start doing that.

from blessed-rs.