Git Product home page Git Product logo

Comments (1)

Andarist avatar Andarist commented on September 27, 2024 1

The last improvements to homomorphic mapped typed instantiated with intersections containing arrays/tuples can be found in this PR: #57801

It even comes with a test case showing the (current) expected behavior for arrays intersected with non-array types (TS playground):

type Box<T> = { value: T };
type Boxify<T> = { [K in keyof T]: Box<T[K]> };
type T5 = Boxify<string[] & { x: string }>;

The result of this is an "expanded" object type. The problem, likely, is that when the result of that gets passed to a spread operator... it won't allow it because this is not an array/tuple type. So it returns an error type upon this instantiation.

However, just spreading arrays/tuples within intersections often "just works" (TS playground):

type Test1<T extends unknown[]> = [...T]

type Input1 = string[] & { a: number }
type Result1 = Test1<Input1>
//    ^? type Result1 = string[]

type Input2 = (string | number)[] & ['foo', string, 42]
type Result2 = Test1<Input2>
//    ^? type Result2 = (string | 42)[]

type Input3 = [string | boolean, string | symbol, ...number[]] & ['foo', string, 43]
type Result3 = Test1<Input3>
//    ^? type Result3 = (string | 43)[]

type Input4 = [string | boolean, boolean, ...number[]] & ['foo', string, 44]
type Result4 = Test1<Input4>
//    ^? type Result4 = any[]

It's worth noticing that Result4 displays as any[] - it's likely that this one is also an error type but I haven't verified it internally.

I'd argue that both should behave the same since the spread mapped type in the example is basically just an Identity type. We can imagine mapped types with other template types but I think it doesn't matter all that much. The output tuple/array structure can be resolved in situation like this and then the element types can be mapped with the template type.

So I think that isArrayOrTupleOrIntersection added in #57801 should be changed to use some over every and then the non-array/tuple members should be simply ignored. Alternatively, a logic like this could be applied within a "spread context" but making the instantiation logic contextual doesn't make much sense to me here.

from typescript.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.