BIPM Feedback: French page 36, sectio 5.4.2, last side note: spaces not correct, compare with original about bipm-si-brochure HOT 8 CLOSED

I've just rendered PDF in my environment:

max after U and V looks ok, but W(Cu) looks with spaces.

jEuclid doesn't use justification.

Original source mathml:

<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
	<mi>w</mi>
	<mfenced open="(" close=")">
		<mrow>
			<mtext>Cu</mtext>
		</mrow>
	</mfenced>
	<mo>=</mo>
	<mn>1,3</mn>
	<mo>×</mo>
	<msup>
		<mrow>
			<mn>10</mn>
		</mrow>
		<mrow>
			<mrow>
				<mo>−</mo>
				<mn>6</mn>
			</mrow>
		</mrow>
	</msup>
</math>

jEuclid renders as:

If we move mfenced open="(" close=")" into nested mtext, i.e.:

<mrow>
	<mtext>(Cu)</mtext>
</mrow>

then we get a bit compact view:

Looks like jEuclid adds some space for mfenced.

In any case isn't looks as original (there isn't distance between w and (:

In the original docx, this equation typed as normal text (not Equation object in Word). If we insert it as Equation, then we get the distance between w and (:

My proposal - move mfenced attributes into nested element in xslt on-fly.

from bipm-si-brochure.

I think the concern is about "Vmax" looking like "V m a x". The space between the parentheses is acceptable. Thanks!

from bipm-si-brochure.

BIPM xslt updated for decreasing space between ( and ).
It affects on these equations: si-brochure-fr.presentation.mathml.pdf

from bipm-si-brochure.

Thank you @Intelligent2013 ! Can we close this now?

from bipm-si-brochure.

Done.

from bipm-si-brochure.

Need confirmation. In the latest provided si-brochure-fr.presentation.mathml.pdf file, line 226 is this:

BIPM pointed out that:

There is still an error in item 226: the index ‘12’ before the C for carbon, should be a superscript, not a subscript: 12C.

But it is encoded correctly in source

[stem%unnumbered]
++++
ii(M)("X") = ii(A)_"r" ("X") [ii(M)(""^{12}"C")//12] = ii(A)_"r" ("X") ii(M)_{rm(u)}
++++

And also rendered correctly in the currently released version:

@Intelligent2013 could you help confirm the latest stylesheet is correct? Thanks!

from bipm-si-brochure.

Yes, the latest stylesheet (in mn-native-pdf/xslt_src) is correct and renders so:

si-brochure-fr.presentation.mathml.pdf shows only difference between source mathml markup and mfenced processing, but not all another mathml markup as preceding superscript, superscript one-level alignment, etc.)

from bipm-si-brochure.

Thank you!

from bipm-si-brochure.